Skip to comments.
Governor Huckabee E-mails Rush; Drive-Bys Miss Point of the Story
RushLimbaugh.com ^
| January 2, 2007
| Rush Limbaugh
Posted on 01/02/2008 8:07:58 PM PST by Eric Blair 2084
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-157 next last
To: Agent Smith
I am not sure what sucking sound you are hearing..but it won’t be Rush being flushed....LOL
The only ‘sucking’ sound I am am hearing is the one that is making noise from the space between the ears of those that think Huckleberry will be the next President.
LOL
To: unspun
The ranks of conservative Republican voters side with Huckabee's interest in the economic status and opportunity of all Americans, vs Limbaugh's Scrooge-Republican ideology: maximize megastockholder profits at Americans' expense.I think this is a valid statement. Good for you.
To: Saundra Duffy
Rush has been around long before and he will be around long after faux conservative populists like Huck. He will be here in 8 years to kick the next “Huck” up and down the sidewalk for public amusement.
Huck will move on to making exercise video informercials with Chuck Norris that we’ll watch at 3 am.
Rush will still be the most listened to talk show host in America.
23
posted on
01/02/2008 8:36:03 PM PST
by
Eric Blair 2084
(Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms shouldn't be a federal agency...it should be a convenience store.)
To: unspun
Your candidate is a fricking joke.
To: kingu
So, let me see if I understand this right - lower American wages are fueling use of Chinese sweatshops? Or competition from Chinese sweatshops are lowering American wages that have had constant increases for the last 50 years? I'm afraid you have to distill some of the rhetoric for me here. I don't think you're really dense, kingu.
It's all about "employee productivity." Feel free to look it up, if you like. It means getting the most profitability out the costs of employment.
We fought a war over that, back in the 1860's, except the cheapest weren't called "employees."
BTW, it isn't class warfare -- it is fighting for a classless society, instead of abusive paternalism. Paternalism is for Old (Socialist) Europe.
25
posted on
01/02/2008 8:37:17 PM PST
by
unspun
(God save us from egos -- especially our own.)
To: LordBridey
26
posted on
01/02/2008 8:37:28 PM PST
by
Eric Blair 2084
(Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms shouldn't be a federal agency...it should be a convenience store.)
To: Eric Blair 2084
27
posted on
01/02/2008 8:37:55 PM PST
by
Checkers
(First they came for the Mormons, but I said nothing because I was not Mormon.)
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
28
posted on
01/02/2008 8:38:19 PM PST
by
Eric Blair 2084
(Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms shouldn't be a federal agency...it should be a convenience store.)
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
“Your candidate is a fricking joke.”
Do you think Hucklebee is even aware he’s crossing a picket line to go on Leno?
~dumb schmuck~
29
posted on
01/02/2008 8:40:31 PM PST
by
Checkers
(First they came for the Mormons, but I said nothing because I was not Mormon.)
To: LordBridey
The ranks of conservative Republican voters side with Huckabee's interest in the economic status and opportunity of all Americans, vs Limbaugh's Scrooge-Republican ideology: maximize megastockholder profits at Americans' expense.
I think this is a valid statement. Good for you.
Thank you. I seriously doubt a curmudgeon-candidate will win, this coming November -- nor a boardroom barron. Those personas won't cut it.
30
posted on
01/02/2008 8:41:30 PM PST
by
unspun
(God save us from egos -- especially our own.)
To: REDWOOD99
“My mistake. Youre a moron.”
NAILED IT!
31
posted on
01/02/2008 8:41:48 PM PST
by
Checkers
(First they came for the Mormons, but I said nothing because I was not Mormon.)
To: Eric Blair 2084
LOL, I like your tagline.
To: Eric Blair 2084
“Huck will move on to making exercise video informercials with Chuck Norris that well watch at 3 am.”
Chuck isn’t going to dump Christie Brinkley for Dumbo Gump.
33
posted on
01/02/2008 8:45:01 PM PST
by
Checkers
(First they came for the Mormons, but I said nothing because I was not Mormon.)
To: Checkers; REDWOOD99
Hardly an argument, eh?
34
posted on
01/02/2008 8:45:03 PM PST
by
unspun
(God save us from egos -- especially our own.)
To: unspun
The ranks of conservative Republican voters side with Huckabee's interest in the economic status and opportunity of all Americans, vs Limbaugh's Scrooge-Republican ideology: maximize megastockholder profits at Americans' expense.Workers of the World, Unite!!!
COMMIE ALERT! COMMIE ALERT! COMMIE ALERT! COMMIE ALERT! COMMIE ALERT! COMMIE ALERT! COMMIE ALERT! COMMIE ALERT! COMMIE ALERT! COMMIE ALERT! COMMIE ALERT! COMMIE ALERT! COMMIE ALERT! COMMIE ALERT! COMMIE ALERT! COMMIE ALERT! COMMIE ALERT! COMMIE ALERT! COMMIE ALERT! COMMIE ALERT! COMMIE ALERT! COMMIE ALERT! COMMIE ALERT! COMMIE ALERT! COMMIE ALERT! COMMIE ALERT! COMMIE ALERT! COMMIE ALERT! COMMIE ALERT!
35
posted on
01/02/2008 8:46:04 PM PST
by
P-Marlowe
(LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
To: Checkers
36
posted on
01/02/2008 8:46:53 PM PST
by
Eric Blair 2084
(Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms shouldn't be a federal agency...it should be a convenience store.)
To: unspun
I don't think you're really dense, kingu. I've not made it personal, try to be civil and make sure you maintain the same quality in dialog.
We fought a war over that, back in the 1860's, except the cheapest weren't called "employees."
While this might have been what revisionists put forth today, there are ample writings from the time that very clearly state what the issues were behind the civil war.
BTW, it isn't class warfare -- it is fighting for a classless society, instead of abusive paternalism. Paternalism is for Old (Socialist) Europe.
Let's take that and run with it.. Name the top three richest people on the planet... You're welcome to go look it up. Look at their roots. None of them inherited their money, they made it. Even the person you target, Rush Limbaugh, built his radio empire out of nothing. If all these people can amass such incredible fortunes, what does this do to your theory of paternalism?
I'm sure if you continue your research, you'll find the home of paternalism is the US Department of State, something the Huckster seems to hold in high esteem.
37
posted on
01/02/2008 8:47:00 PM PST
by
kingu
(No, I don't use sarcasm tags - it confuses people.)
To: unspun
“Fighting for a classless society” didn’t Carl Marx say that!
38
posted on
01/02/2008 8:47:06 PM PST
by
kempo
(I)
To: keepitreal
“We the little stockholders are happy to have our profits maximized as well. It helps pay the bills.”
When is Huck going to start wailing about Halliburton and Blackwater?
39
posted on
01/02/2008 8:48:25 PM PST
by
Checkers
(First they came for the Mormons, but I said nothing because I was not Mormon.)
To: kempo
“Fighting for a classless society” didn’t Carl Marx say that! He was more of a "dictatorship of the proletariat" kind of guy. Maybe you're thinking of Jefferson or Lincoln.
40
posted on
01/02/2008 8:48:48 PM PST
by
unspun
(God save us from egos -- especially our own.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-157 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson