[CHICAGOFARMER]

If any married couple prudently believes they should limit childbearing for health or financial reasons or any other serious reason, they have the right and responsibiity to limit their sexual and reproductive behavior accordingly.
And if not, not.

They don’t need you, ChicagoFarmer, or Al Gore or Greenpeace of Planned Barrenhood or anybody else to label them a global threat, bewail their fertility, disparage their babies or sabotage their pregnancies.

xxxxxxxxxxxx

Better to let the population explode to 10 billlion and tens of milllions starve to death every years. Yep you got the better solution, starve millions every year.

Socialists like you will never touch this radioactive discussion because it is not political correct to talk about who lives and who dies. Your solution is ok in your mind, and let millions die while you baby your narrow views and protected USA view..

How stupid of logic to let a problem go unaddressed.

[wagglebee]

Better to let the population explode to 10 billlion and tens of milllions starve to death every years. Yep you got the better solution, starve millions every year.

Can you provide a link to a single news story about a single person starving to death in the United States in 2007 (with the exception of Terri Schiavo-style murders)?

[Mrs. Don-o]

The phrase "population explosion" is a rhetorical panic tactic. Couples don't have "population explosions," they have babies. Only the married couples themselves have a moral right to decide when and if to conceive a baby. They don't need immoral means such as state-sponsored "population control," sterilization or abortion to do so,and they don't need your permission or mine to do so.

By the way, your repeated use of the word "socialist" applied to me and to other prolifers who disagree with you, is irrational and abusive.

[MEGoody]

What are you doing to address the problem?