Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: r9etb
That, right there, is exactly where I got the comment. What a whiny little priss.

It would seem that you find something effeminate about the ability to give an articulate, detailed, bill of grievences.

Of course, by that standard, our founding fathers would be a gaggle of pantywaists.

You'll excuse me if I just chalk your comments up to "the lady doth protest too much."

166 posted on 01/02/2008 3:36:08 PM PST by papertyger (changing words quickly metastasizes into changing facts -- Ann Coulter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies ]


To: papertyger
You'll excuse me if I just chalk your comments up to "the lady doth protest too much."

No -- just chalk me up as somebody who isn't afraid of marriage.

167 posted on 01/02/2008 3:49:34 PM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies ]

To: papertyger

Hit paper, I saw some of the comments to the New Rules of Marriage piece. I wanted to recommend Mike LaSalle’s reading of the Women’s Real Man to you covers some of the subjects here. Oftentimes when men stand up to women they question their manhood. This is predictable, common and fallacious. Anyway, check out this excellent listen:
http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/03/08/the-womans-real-man-pt-3/#comment-33901


306 posted on 01/07/2008 3:12:52 PM PST by rollingthunder2006
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson