How about “He was an evil little man who tried to push world-wide slavery via world-wide socialism via world-wide ecofraud.”
R.I.P.
History will not be kind.
His decay will release carbon into the atmosphere. Has he planned for this?
Oh—so Global Warming was another Socialist plot?
RIP.
So, is he cold NOW?
We, as a society, find ourselves confronted with a spectrum of potentially catastrophic and irreversible environmental problems, for which conventional approaches will not suffice in providing solutions. These problems are characterized, above all, by their unpredictability. This means that surprise is to be expected, and that sudden qualitative shifts in dynamics present serious problems for management. In general, it is difficult to detect strong signals of change early enough to motivate effective solutions, or even to develop scientific consensus on a time scale rapid enough to allow effective solution. Furthermore, such signals, even when detected, are likely to be displaced in space or sector from the source, so that the motivation for action is small. Conventional market mechanisms thus will be inadequate to address these challenges.
Now thats what I call committed to CO2 emission reduction.
One less shyster to worry about.
AP Weasel Word Special!
The writer is attempting to draw a direct causational link but is too cowardly to do so...hence the choice of 'relevant.'
And he's been dead for 30 years!!!
~~Anthropogenic Global Warming ping~~