Skip to comments.
Military Use of Unmanned Aircraft Soars
Associated Press ^
| 1-1-08
| LOLITA C. BALDOR
Posted on 01/01/2008 2:50:40 PM PST by george76
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
AP is not happy that the surge is working...
.
1
posted on
01/01/2008 2:50:42 PM PST
by
george76
To: george76
Got that right.
And wait ‘til they make the connection between military and Border Patrol use of the UAVs. Not much difference - the BP Predators aren’t armed.
2
posted on
01/01/2008 2:55:09 PM PST
by
HiJinx
(~ Support our Troops ~ www.americasupportsyou.mil ~)
To: george76
Why are we still buying manned warplanes when this technology is well-proven and so much less costly? Unmanned aircraft risk no crew or pilots, can do the jobs that current fighters, bombers, jamming and surveillance aircraft do now, at a mere fraction of the cost!
3
posted on
01/01/2008 2:56:45 PM PST
by
2ndDivisionVet
(Your "dirt" on Fred is about as persuasive as a Nancy Pelosi Veteran's Day Speech)
To: 2ndDivisionVet; B4Ranch
And these drones can hang around over the battlefield for a very long time.
4
posted on
01/01/2008 3:08:25 PM PST
by
george76
(Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
To: george76
Extremely good development.
5
posted on
01/01/2008 3:25:04 PM PST
by
samtheman
(Fred Thompson '08)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Why are we still buying manned warplanes when this technology is well-proven and so much less costly?
Because it also works great with manned aircraft pointing out targets and directing ordinance onto the target from manned aircraft after it runs out. Manned on station aircraft also have very little response time for emergency situations. As it stands right now, UAV's are a great force multiplier, not a replacement.
6
posted on
01/01/2008 3:27:07 PM PST
by
BerryDingle
(With friends like the media, who needs enemas ?)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
"Why are we still buying manned warplanes when this technology is well-proven and so much less costly?" I believe most of them are controlled via satellite. What do we do when an opponent shoots out satellites down?
7
posted on
01/01/2008 3:27:54 PM PST
by
antinomian
(Show me a robber baron and I'll show you a pocket full of senators.)
To: george76
8
posted on
01/01/2008 3:30:22 PM PST
by
NordP
(Such tough choices ahead, I'm now a "middle of the road" voter--somewhere between RUSH & Savage ;-))
To: george76
"The Ravens, which soldiers fling into the air and use for surveillance, will rack up about 300,000 hours this year - double the time they were used last year..." As sexy as things like the "Global Hawk" are, I think this kind of field intelligence will be FAR more valuable, and will save many lives. Add to those the uses of ground robots (toy tanks with a camera) will be of immense benefit to the ground-pounders.
9
posted on
01/01/2008 3:40:03 PM PST
by
Wonder Warthog
(The Hog of Steel-NRA)
To: george76
10
posted on
01/01/2008 3:50:03 PM PST
by
Kevmo
(We should withdraw from Iraq — via Tehran. And Duncan Hunter is just the man to get that job done.)
To: Kevmo; Wonder Warthog; NordP; antinomian; 2ndDivisionVet; HiJinx
The Army has afforded me the opportunity to train with the UAS as a UAV Det. Commander. I was prior enlisted, and I have to admit that this is one of the most rewarding and fascinating jobs I have ever had.
If I could go back 20 years and do it all over, I would definitely be a 96U and then become a 350U. Unfortunately, I am up for a promotion and will probably start doing staff work as a 35D/35E.
Check out my handle for my homepage with photos of different UAVs.
11
posted on
01/01/2008 3:56:26 PM PST
by
DCBryan1
(Arm Pilots&Teachers. Build the Wall. Export Illegals. Profile Muslims.Kill all child molesters RFN!)
To: george76
I think this is a great way to keep pilots flying that have been grounded for one reason or another.
I have no idea of the true capabilities of a drone but I like the idea that they could be set up to have cameras searching the sky in every direction simultaneously. If we have troops on the ground, it could track their movement to the tightest detail thereby preventing another fighter or bomber from doing harm.
12
posted on
01/01/2008 4:08:05 PM PST
by
B4Ranch
(( "Freedom is not free, but don't worry the U.S. Marine Corps will pay most of your share." ))
To: B4Ranch; BIGLOOK; SunkenCiv; elhombrelibre; jazusamo
I like the idea that troops on the ground would have their own little air force that could be available quickly for recon and maybe lots more.
13
posted on
01/01/2008 4:12:10 PM PST
by
george76
(Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Why are we still buying manned warplanes when this technology is well-proven and so much less costly? Well, as it stands right now, it is very hard to shoot down one of these
with one of these
In the future, once unmanned air superiority aircraft are developed, you must consider the consequences of having your entire air superiority capability depend on getting a guidance signal from Nintendo Air Force Base in Nevada to your thousands of unmanned aircraft in an electronic and space warfare environment.
14
posted on
01/01/2008 4:17:14 PM PST
by
Polybius
To: george76; AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; ...
Thanks george76. Of course, the idea for these mini-craft came from tiny little aliens who regularly visit our world wearing human-looking robotic suits. ;’)
15
posted on
01/01/2008 4:24:45 PM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________Profile updated Sunday, December 30, 2007)
To: Polybius; 2ndDivisionVet
Or, we could use the ‘all your eggs in one basket’ argument against going to a total Unmanned force....
16
posted on
01/01/2008 4:25:35 PM PST
by
HiJinx
(~ Support our Troops ~ www.americasupportsyou.mil ~)
To: DCBryan1
The Army has afforded me the opportunity to train with the UAS as a UAV Det. Commander. See Post 14.
In your opinion, how vulnerable would a U.S. Air Force depending solely on air superiority UAV's be against an opponent such as Russia with serious EW and anti-satellite warfare capabilities?
17
posted on
01/01/2008 4:26:45 PM PST
by
Polybius
To: george76
18
posted on
01/01/2008 4:29:59 PM PST
by
TheLion
To: TheLion
19
posted on
01/01/2008 4:31:06 PM PST
by
TheLion
To: Wonder Warthog
Did you ever play Doom2? They could build the robotic spiders with cameras and firepower.
I also like the idea of tiny devices that can scope out an area without being seen.
How about some drones the size of an insect. I’ll bet these come eventually.
20
posted on
01/01/2008 4:36:10 PM PST
by
TheLion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson