Hmmm... no mention of McCain, Fred, or Hunter. Nope, no bias here. More evidence of the drive-by’s efforts to manipulate the GOP turnout.
Well, they did not mention Ron Paul either, who is doing better than 2 out of the 3 you mentioned, and I am glad about that.
This piece is fatally narrow, as you point out. Fred would help avoid these difficulties, and so would McCain, in my humble opinion. I know the name “McCain” has been poison of late, but his recent conversion on taxes and immigration is, I believe, at least as sincere as Romney’s.
My main issue with Fred is desire and tenacity (or a noticeable lack thereof). He just doesn’t seem to want the nomination very much, evidenced by his late start, lackluster campaigning style and propensity to schedule few events or even cancel some of the ones already on his calendar. Sorry to all you Fred boosters out there, but he just doesn’t enthrall me. . .
Now why do you think that? just because the liberal socialist Democrat press give the Hillery all the free ink they can?
It mentioned only Huck and Rudy. If it was an article about McCain vs. Romney, what would you say?
(PS: National Review may be lots of things, but biased fans of Huck and Rudy, it is NOT!)