Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Stoat

Yeah, unfortunately social sciences (esp. demography, economics, sociology) have been fixated with lowering birth rates since the 1950s. Only very recent did that they start to pay attention to negative birth rate and its consequences.


25 posted on 01/01/2008 5:55:48 AM PST by paudio (Rose: I loath and despise money! Father: You also spend it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: paudio
Only very recent did that they start to pay attention to negative birth rate and its consequences.

And yet political fashion still holds sway in the West, despite voluminous evidence that we are intentionally 'underbirthing' ourselves to extinction, or at least to dhimmitude.

I believe that there have been several recent books by Conservative authors touching on these issues, but because they are by Conservative authors they are ignored by the mainstream press who continue to preach abortion and tiny families to white Westerners but bleat "diversity" and "acceptance" of everything when it comes to others

26 posted on 01/01/2008 6:01:34 AM PST by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2012: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson