[fieldmarshaldj]

"Mitt Romney professes conservative principles."

Please, don't. I'm going to stop you right there. This man can profess to be the 2nd coming of our Lord, it doesn't mean you accept it to be so. I've known him 14 years, and I'm going to tell you right here and now, he is more dangerous and destructive than any regular rodent candidate. I'm embarrassed that I once did a small amount of participation in his 1994 Senate campaign, but in those days, I was stupid enough to believe ANY Republican was better than any Democrat. There are worse things than Democrats, and those are Democrats that have systematically infiltrated the Republican party for the purposes of maximizing damage. The man is a pathological liar, completely absent of morality or principles and would sell out anything or anyone for power. He's bribed his way through this election season, picking off those that could be bought, and using his slick, "trust me" persona to fool the rest. I would trust Hillary Clinton before I'd trust him, and that is sickening to realize. I'll say it again, he is absolutely dangerous and cannot be trusted under any circumstances. Nothing that comes out of his mouth can be believed.

[reasonisfaith]

When I watch Romney speaking and his body language particularly in the Iowa debate, and hear reports of little tantrums he throws behind the scenes, I am inclined to believe your description of his character.

[reasonisfaith]

“Democrats that have systematically infiltrated the Republican party for the purposes of maximizing damage.”

This describes Romney, McCain, Huckabee and Giuliani. I’m sick of it.

[Ghengis]

I saw him raise his hand, stand in shock as Thompson said no and then proclaim, "I'm with him!" That showed me how Romney's lack of firm foundation allows him to turn on a dime in any circumstance.

I do not find that an admirable trait in an executive who will deal with that question, which affects the sovereignty entire economic future of our country.

[nathanbedford]

Your indignation, indeed one might say, your bitterness, evidently comes out of a personal experience with Romney. Because I am aware of the quality of your posts I am inclined to take that as an evidence of some weight but surely you must understand that the rest of your post is purely invective and conclusionary in nature.

What am I to do with that?