Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Intel Community: 'Military killed Bhutto'
Middle East Times,Egypt ^ | December 31, 2007 | CLAUDE SALHANI

Posted on 12/31/2007 5:01:45 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki

Intel Community: 'Military killed Bhutto'

By CLAUDE SALHANI (Editor, Middle East Times)

Published: December 31, 2007

Lower and middle level officers of the Pakistani army and the Pakistani air force were involved in the killing of former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto, according to various intelligence sources, including members of India's counter-intelligence service.

Well-informed sources have told the Middle East Times that these rogue elements of the Pakistani military support the jihadis and share their extremist views of an ultra-conservative form of Islam.

One former CIA official told a Middle East Times source that, "It's worrying when half of your lower or mid-level Pak intelligence analysts have bin Laden screen-savers on their computers."

The conclusion of a number of U.S. analysts is that al-Qaida and other jihadis have successfully penetrated the armed forces and security services in Pakistan. If these findings are substantiated it could be a matter of grave concern, given the fact that Pakistan is in possession of nuclear weapons.

Should the radical elements of Pakistan's military ever succeed in overthrowing the current regime and taking over the country, it would radically alter the geo-political map of the region -- and not for the better, either. A nuclear-armed Pakistan run by pro-bin Laden sympathizers would likely initiate a climate of high tension not only with neighboring India, but could extend towards the already volatile Middle East.

Backing up their theory that pro-extremists found sympathy and support among influential people in the Pakistani security forces, the sources cited the example of Rashi Rauf, the prime suspect in a recent plot to blow up 10 U.S. passenger airplanes in the United Kingdom last year. Rauf escaped last week while being taken from court in Rawalpindi. The prime suspects are the security personnel, who some believe, have facilitated Rauf's escape, the sources said.

Of the seven or eight attempts to assassinate President Pervez Musharraf, two took place in December 2003 when rockets were fired at his vehicle during a visit to Rawalpindi, the same city where Bhutto was killed on Thursday.

Then there was the attempt to fire on his plane with an anti-aircraft gun in early 2007. There were also two suicide attacks on the Army's General HQ and two attacks outside the offices of the ISI, after Pakistani security forces, on Musharraf's orders, assaulted the Red Mosque, the Lal Masjid, in Islamabad last July when Islamists retrenched inside the mosque with scores of hostages.

Following the two attacks on Musharraf, junior army and air force officers were arrested. The ensuing investigation discovered that they had ties with Jaish-e-Mohammad, an Islamist group. In the rocket attack, the son of an army brigadier general was arrested.

The source says, however, that only lower-ranking army officials were arrested and court-martialed. The investigations are dead in the water.

Bhutto's main fear, according to a well-placed source, was that Brig. Gen. (rtd) Ijaz Shah of the Pakistani IB would prove a grave threat to her. She was worried about security but did not make it a big issue until Dec. 26 when she complained that the electronic jammers used to neutralize IED's were faulty.

But one U.S. analyst familiar with the situation told the Middle East Times that Mrs. Bhutto was warned of security issues. "She was warned of the dangers yet she continued to behave in a way in which the Secret Service in the U.S. would never accept," said Thomas Houlahan, director of military assessment with the Center for Security and Science in Washington, D.C.

"She insisted on having her own people run her protection," said Houlahan, who added, "but nothing would protect her when she decided to stand through the sun roof of her car.

"That was extremely reckless," said Houlahan. "I don't see what could have been done."

Opposition to Benazir Bhutto was to be found not only in the country's army and air force from bin Laden sympathizers, but also from old Zia ul-Haq loyalists who did not want the daughter of Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto in a position of power.

"They especially loathed the idea that Bhutto had pledged the United States to allow U.S. intelligence to interrogate rogue atomic scientist A.Q. Khan and allow U.S. forces to hunt for bin Laden on Pakistani soil," said the source. "She did not have much of a chance."

The general view among many in the intelligence community is that Musharraf himself is a marked man and not likely to stay in power too long. The question is this: If the Islamists ever succeed in removing Musharraf, with Bhutto now gone, who would be likely to govern Pakistan and gain control of its nuclear arsenal?

--

Comments may be sent to Claude@metimes.com


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bhutto; musharraf; pakistan; pakistaniarmy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: sukhoi-30mki; Saberwielder; Dog
This nest of takfiris and their intrigues was on the radar of the US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and the day after Bhutto’s killing Sheikh Essa was targeted by CIA Predator drones in his home in North Waziristan. According to Asia Times Online contacts, he survived, but was seriously wounded. Sheikh Essa had only recently recovered from a stroke which had left him bedridden.

This somewhat dampened the jubilation in the jihadi camps over Bhutto’s death and al-Qaeda members had to flee to safe havens. Nevertheless, their intention to carry out more attacks is as steadfast as ever.
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/South_Asia/JA01Df01.html

21 posted on 12/31/2007 5:49:17 AM PST by AdmSmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ALASKA
I think India would launch at the first sign that the Paki's nukes were about to be taken over....

I think India's looking for any excuse to mow Pak down.

22 posted on 12/31/2007 5:53:21 AM PST by randog (What the...?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

I don’t know if anyone else noticed, but this is what Hillary said.

Why?

Because she is doing what other DEMS do. They take ‘sensitive, classified’ info they get at the Senate Intelligence Committee hearings, and divulge it to the press to try to gain in the political arena.

All the DEMS spouting about WITHDRAWAL from IRAQ were doing so after hearing about the future plans for withdrawal from IRAQ.

They do these things to try and take credit for other’s work and plans.

They reveal ‘secret’ or ‘classified’ info for their own personal gain. It is called TREASON.


23 posted on 12/31/2007 5:58:39 AM PST by UCANSEE2 (Just saying what 'they' won't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crz
I think you mean Mansour Ijaz, who was on FNC on the day of Bhutto’s assassination, evidently they were close friends.
He’s a pretty interesting man who has some real insight into the Clinton failures to stop bin Laden.
24 posted on 12/31/2007 6:01:07 AM PST by ishabibble (ALL-AMERICAN INFIDEL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RedEyeJack

Spot on, Jack. The Pashtu are the center of gravity and must be brought to heel if there is to be any real solution to what is going on over here.


25 posted on 12/31/2007 6:16:36 AM PST by MadJack ("Patience is bitter, but its fruit is sweet." (Afghan proverb))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts

No comment....cough cough.


26 posted on 12/31/2007 6:56:25 AM PST by DCBryan1 (Arm Pilots&Teachers. Build the Wall. Export Illegals. Profile Muslims.Kill all child molesters RFN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
who would be likely to govern Pakistan and gain control of its nuclear arsenal?

In Lurkers World the answers would be "Who cares who rules a country full of smoking craters?" and "Us."

L

27 posted on 12/31/2007 7:21:31 AM PST by Lurker (Pimping my blog: http://lurkerslair-lurker.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson