Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: upchuck; codercpc; Miss Marple; Liz

>>>Good analysis Liz.

No analysis, just hysterics.

>>>Horror of horrors, he is tied with Fred who spent the last 3 weeks in a last ditch effort in the state. Rudy has never concentrated on Florida, so being tied with someone who has would be considered good news in some places.

THAT is analysis. Considering Fred seems to be the generally favored FR candidate, isn’t that the meat of the article?

>>>Is it possible that you could write some political analysis about Guiliani without the use of terms like “Rootypuke”?

Embarrassing, isn’t it.

RasmussenMarkets.com is a “futures market” that several days ago put Rudy’s odds of winning Iowa as almost non-existent, but still likely the eventual nominee. Maybe he figures his chances of the convention win are better if he doesn’t throw money away in a place that would favor Huckabee?

To Win Iowa Republican Caucus

Rudy Giuliani .. 0.2

Mike Huckabee .. 54.9

John McCain .. 4.5

Mitt Romney .. 40.0


15 posted on 12/31/2007 4:07:36 AM PST by tlb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: tlb
THAT is analysis.

Actually, it's fiction. Rudy most certainly has concentrated on Florida.

23 posted on 12/31/2007 5:17:21 AM PST by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: tlb

I’m not a fan of Rudy per se. but I do not see this as analysis at all. If you look at the delegate count he looks to still be leading by a wide margin if he wins most super Tuesday states. Iowa is irrelevant. Ditto SC and NH.

The strategy seems sound to me.


98 posted on 12/31/2007 6:53:20 PM PST by Sunnyflorida (Drill in the Gulf of Mexico/Anwar, etc and we can join OPEC!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: tlb

Rudy is a pervert. That may not seem like a very elegant argument to a Rudy lover, but it is the reason that he is falling in the polls and the reason he will never be the Commander in Chief of this country.


100 posted on 12/31/2007 6:57:37 PM PST by tear gas (Because of the 22nd Amendment, we are losing President. Bush. Can we afford to lose him now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson