Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Golden Compass -- box-office update (Falls to #12 In 4th Weekend)
FilmChat ^ | December 30, 2007 | Peter T Chattaway

Posted on 12/30/2007 8:26:08 PM PST by icwhatudo

It opened three weeks ago at #1. Then it slipped to #3, and then to #9. And now, in its fourth weekend, The Golden Compass has fallen off the weekly top-ten chart altogether, landing at #12 with a "domestic" cume of $58.9 million -- and thus it continues to trail behind last year's considerably cheaper fantasy flick Eragon. And don't even bother trying to compare this film's grosses to those of the recent fantasy blockbusters whose ranks this film so desperately wanted to join.

But wait. Variety reports that The Golden Compass is still #2 overseas -- surpassed only by the unexpectedly huge hit I Am Legend -- and out there, the film has grossed $187 million, more than triple what it has made in North America (and more than Eragon made overseas in its entire theatrical run).

So the film isn't a complete bust. Then again, as noted here three weeks ago, New Line Cinema sold off the foreign distribution rights to cover some of its production costs before the film had even come out, so there is only so much comfort the studio can glean from the overseas receipts.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News
KEYWORDS: boxoffice; goldencompass; hollywood
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last
Gotta think the final two installments are in danger of never being made.

Full weekends estimates here:

Box Office Mojo

1 posted on 12/30/2007 8:26:09 PM PST by icwhatudo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo
Then again, as noted here three weeks ago, New Line Cinema sold off the foreign distribution rights to cover some of its production costs before the film had even come out, so there is only so much comfort the studio can glean from the overseas receipts.

My, my. What a shame!

2 posted on 12/30/2007 8:31:08 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo
Considering the final budget was about $250 million (it went $70 million over reshooting the final scene and general post production), plus another 70-100 million (or more) in marketing, it's doubtful the 2nd one will be green lighted. If it does, it will have a much smaller budget.

Even worse for New Line is that it already sold it's foreign rights where 75% of it's revenue total is coming from. With a 50/50 split, even if he had kept the rights, it would need around 650 - 700 million worldwide to break even. It looks like it will probably end around 350-400 million meaning it will lose (before TV, DVDs, etc) around $100-$175 million. After all is said and done, it will probably lose $50-$125 million.

3 posted on 12/30/2007 8:31:27 PM PST by rb22982
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo

Sounds like its doing pretty good. Looks to me like 300 million worldwide may be within reach; thats really quite good. I had no idea it was doing that well.

I would say that would be enough to continue the series. It will do well on DVD too and on cable. Demand for sequels will come from that.


4 posted on 12/30/2007 8:32:16 PM PST by OmegaMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OmegaMan

300 million ww is about 150 million net for the studio. The production budget was $250 million + advertising.


5 posted on 12/30/2007 8:33:29 PM PST by rb22982
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rb22982

It has been a disappointment here in the US. But Im surprised how well its doing overseas. I could seem them going ahead with the next two, but shooting them both at the same time on a lower budget.

Its not done its run yet; lets see what it ends up with first before we declare it a flop for the studio. My 300 estimate may have been low, from your post it appears so. So it even did better than I thought!


6 posted on 12/30/2007 8:38:00 PM PST by OmegaMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo

Who would have guessed that an atheist fairy tale aimed at kids would flop in the U.S? Well, other than everyone with a brain, that is.


7 posted on 12/30/2007 8:39:49 PM PST by inkling (exurbanleague.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OmegaMan

Maybe, I don’t see the shareholders being happy in NL risking another 500 million in production (plus 150+ million on advertising) on 2 films that didn’t do well domestically and so-so internationally with so-so word of mouth (C+ yahoo user ratings which is well below average)


8 posted on 12/30/2007 8:42:26 PM PST by rb22982
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rb22982

Theyd have to keep the budget down. But I can see them doing it with these numbers, or especially the numbers you predict it to make. 400 million worldwide would mean it did pretty well. That would bode well for DVD and cable tv too. Obviously there are alot of people interested in this story then, just not in the US.

I actually think its problem in the US had to do mostly with its female lead. A female lead for any kind of action movie is a hard sell in the US. It looked kind of... artsy too, like it was intellectual as much as it was about action. And the controversy didnt help here either, thats for sure.


9 posted on 12/30/2007 8:54:05 PM PST by OmegaMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: OmegaMan

400 million is top end, and would require it to end at 300 million international and squeek up to near 100m domestic which is doubtful. I wouldn’t be surprised if it only hits 300 million either WW but at this point $350 million is likely with the holiday season boosting legs a bit. They are fortunately that the $ is weak as if it came out 5 years ago, that $350m WW # would only be around 225-250 million.


10 posted on 12/30/2007 8:59:22 PM PST by rb22982
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo
Your link is wrong. Should be Here

regards,

11 posted on 12/30/2007 9:02:51 PM PST by Thoreau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OmegaMan
This one is heading the same direction as the DaVinci Cr@p movie... I mean the DaVinci Bad Movie Syndrome...

Where are the sequels to the DaVinci Cr@p???

Also, Golden Compass really has been doing terrible.

When you release a movie and it goes out to 3000+ theaters, you expect it gross lots and lots of movie.

Try comparing this big budget flop to The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe.

That movie pulled in $744 million from the box office, and it had a smaller budget than Golden Compass.

RED INK is the best way to describe Golden Compass...

12 posted on 12/30/2007 9:13:52 PM PST by topher (Let us return to old-fashioned morality - morality that has stood the test of time...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: topher

Its a flop here, but it is doing surprisingly well overseas.

Da Vinci Code made a huge amount of money. That movie was crap though, I agree. One of the worst I ever paid to see lol. They are making the sequel though. Its called Angels and Demons, I think. Tom Hanks is back, and I think Naomi Watts is to be the leading lady.


13 posted on 12/30/2007 9:17:57 PM PST by OmegaMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo

I really wouldn’t worry about sequels.

From my own exhaustive research it seems most kids give up a third of the way through the second book, “The Subtle Knife” when character studies and subplots start spinning off in a dozen directions and the church-bashing starts turning into a hectoring lecture.


14 posted on 12/30/2007 11:07:39 PM PST by sinanju
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rb22982

I took my 11 year old.
The plot was impossible to follow for the 1st half of the film. What a waste of good actors. The special effects were amazing, it was difficult to get into the film when the effects so overshadowed the semblance of a moral lesson. (or at least a coherent storyline), and the ending!
if it had written: “to be continued...’ it would have been more subtle!


15 posted on 12/31/2007 1:15:13 AM PST by Sarah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo

Yeah, well, I’d go see an athiest-written fantasy before I’d see ALIENS vs. PREDATOR 2. In that masterpiece, pregnant women in a maternity ward about to deliver are force-fed alien eggs, resulting in their screaming and exploding with several chestbursters-and newborn babies are eaten or infected as well (THAT is implied rather than shown, Thank God). In the beginning, a young boy watches one burst out of his Father, just before the same thing happens to him. And this POS opened on CHRISTMAS DAY!! Tell everyone you know to avoid this atrocity. I don’t know where this crap all started (the SAW franchise?) -It’s supposed to be ‘horror’, but I call it ‘gorenography’.


16 posted on 12/31/2007 2:54:13 AM PST by The Ghost of Rudy McRomney ("I'm a proven leader. That's what the Des Moines Register said.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo

I guess there is, after all, a way to show “them” what isn’t acceptable. Don’t you really kinda like it when Hollywood loses one.


17 posted on 12/31/2007 3:02:34 AM PST by Picklezz (HUNTER: SOLID - A Conservative's Conservative. He's the man for the job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rb22982

You’re forgetting one important thing ... they sure as shootin’ won’t be selling off the foreign this time around.

Also, when you’re working out TGC’s potential profits/losses, factor in that the film banked 60 + million right away from its distribution rights sales, the flick is working outside the US which likely means huge liscencing royalties (this is a kids flick, afterall) from merchandising for NL, studio’s usually negotiate a cut of all books old post-flick within a certain window of time, etc.

I doubt the director will be back.


18 posted on 12/31/2007 4:34:40 AM PST by skipper18 (Freshmeat!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: skipper18

Factor in that each European screen means about $100,000 costs. A 3000 screen opening in the US costs $30 million in printing and distributing... costs not counted in production, but marketing.

Usually movies oversees reduce printing costs by staggering their openings over several markets, so they can reuse prints. NewLine opened the movie pretty much simultaneously around the world. It prevented bad word of mouth, but at a staggering cost.

NewLine’s production costs of $250 don’t include international distribution or dmoestic or international marketing. And people only buy the videotape if they liked the movie. This production is going to cost BIG TIME. The wierd thing is that the people who will lose the money are the British taxpayers.

If the first movie bombs, it’s written off as one loser in a diverse portfolio. If the second movie gets made after such losses, however, it’ll nakedly be state-funded anti-Christian propaganda.


19 posted on 12/31/2007 5:28:45 AM PST by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: The Ghost of Rudy McRomney

Whatever possessed you to go see that movie?


20 posted on 12/31/2007 6:20:21 AM PST by randog (What the...?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson