Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lorianne
The old order—a larger, more politically moderate voting public—was a matter of choice, writes Prior, or rather a lack thereof. In 1970, at about 6:30 p.m. at least two or three nights a week, about half the country could be found watching the evening news on one of the three major networks. The broadcasts tended to be fairly sober-minded, on-the-one-hand, on-the-other-hand presentations by trusted anchormen like Walter Cronkite. The network news shows had to be evenhanded because they appealed to such large and politically diverse audiences, and because the networks had to mind a "Fairness Doctrine," imposed by Congress in return for granting precious broadcast licenses on the narrow bandwidth of VHF TV. The huge audiences watched them because, with only four or five channels to watch on most TVs, there wasn't much else on.

Well, there's the money quote. The author longs for the old days when the left had a complete stranglehold on the media as opposed to today, when the stranglehold is only almost complete. If he feels that way, it is only natural that he sees today's climate as polarized--more than one opinion is widely available today. That sucks if the only opinion disseminated by the media used to be yours.

13 posted on 12/30/2007 6:33:50 PM PST by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ModelBreaker

Bingo


28 posted on 12/30/2007 7:18:50 PM PST by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson