It seems to me that he's NOT "avoiding" the question. You're repeatedly asking the wrong person.
You're asking why cops and judges aren't regularly tested. He's told you that he can't speak for judges, but as a cop, he's subject to tests any time and anywhere.
Then you go back and ask him why he's not being regularly tested, ignoring his answer, claiming he avoided answering your question, and asking the same question again.
You should be asking the policy makers in the state. They're the ones who could answer your question.
Mark
He's told you as a cop, he's subject to tests any time and anywhere.
But that wasn't the question my friend.
Read back...You can't be this stupid.
If necessary, I'll post the specific questions he failed to answer, just for you. Ya see he never did answer the yes or no from 33, 41 etc, etc, etc.
There is a big difference between "being subject to drug testing", and being part of a mandatory, random drug testing program, where you are subject to random drug testing at any time, and people in the group, are "randomly picked" on a routine basis. I know it, he knows it, and everyone else knows it.
He just decided to head for the tall grass and refused to answer the question.
Let me know if I can help *you* understand what is specifically being asked here.
And just so you know, outside of a LEOs probationary period, they are **NOT** subject to "random" drug testing programs.... See how simple that was?
You might want to ask yourself why the other poster refused to answer the question that was asked 9 or 10 times.
Bit of advise...Beware of those that refuse to answer, or dance around, simple direct questions.