To: jodiluvshoes
I read the whole thing. It was a thinly disguised apologia for ignoring Huck's absolute failure to address fiscal, small govt. and defense legs of the coalition because, gosh, he's
moral.
Sorry, I don't give money to televangelists who claim they are collecting dollars for Jesus, and I don't give my vote to televangelists who claim they are collecting votes for Jesus, either. Huckabee reeks of the latter.
8 posted on
12/29/2007 9:53:54 PM PST by
LexBaird
(Behold, thou hast drinken of the Aide of Kool, and are lost unto Men.)
To: LexBaird
You’re reading Huckabee’s name into the article. He argued for the candidate who was most morally consistent the longest. He also argued for secure borders, which disqualifies Huckabee.
Regarding “moral values”, he states what he means: sanctity of life, no lying, no stealing. I thought the only candidates who could pass the gauntlet of his standard were Hunter and Thompson.
18 posted on
12/30/2007 5:13:09 AM PST by
Forgiven_Sinner
(For God so loved the world, that He gave His only Son that whosoever believes in Him should not die)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson