Posted on 12/29/2007 2:57:11 PM PST by Signalman
The great burden of former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney's presidential campaign is that he is the sole Republican competing in all of the key early contests that begin with next Thursday's Iowa caucus. That could also prove Romney's great opportunity.
Both Iowa and New Hampshire remain within his reach, something no other Republican can say.
One by one, each of Romney's competitors has retreated to a regional stronghold strategy. Mike Huckabee, an ordained Baptist minister, is running hard in Iowa and in South Carolina -- two states where he benefits from the large presence of evangelical conservatives -- but is largely skipping more secular New Hampshire.
Former Tennessee Sen. Fred Thompson is following the same path, though leaving a lighter footprint. Arizona Sen. John McCain, though he incongruously turned up for a rally in Des Moines Thursday morning, has no real organization in Iowa and has invested almost all his time and money in New Hampshire.
Rudy Giuliani hopes to attract some media attention with an Iowa visit this weekend, but he long ago abandoned the state and has now retrenched his television advertising in New Hampshire, too. He's betting on Florida, which doesn't vote until Jan. 29 -- light years away in campaign time.
Only Romney is competing all-out in Iowa and New Hampshire -- as well as in Michigan, South Carolina and Florida, the other major January contests. This pattern presents Romney with an obvious disadvantage. With the Iowa caucus approaching on Jan. 3, and the New Hampshire primary following just five days later, Romney must divide his effort while his opponents concentrate theirs. But his broader reach also presents him a greater opportunity for early breakthroughs -- and a greater capacity to survive an early stumble.
The contrast in strategy rests on a disparity in resources. Romney can fight on more fronts because his personal fortune allows him to sign checks for his campaign on the front as well as the back.
But the other candidates' stronghold strategies also reflect the limits of their reach within the party. McCain and Giuliani are hobbled in Iowa and South Carolina by resistance from the evangelical conservatives who dominate both contests. In mirror image, Huckabee and Thompson are burdened in New Hampshire by their lack of connection with socially moderate voters. (Huckabee faces the additional hurdle of suspicion from many leading economic conservatives.) Each has written off some early states because they do not believe they fit with Republican voters there.
"With the exception of Romney, people have put together campaigns that... are designed around their weaknesses," notes GOP consultant Terry Nelson, the former campaign manager for McCain.
More than any of his rivals, Romney is presenting himself as the candidate who can unify fiscal, social and foreign policy conservatives, and also reach out beyond the party base. Yet after amassing a governing record in Massachusetts more moderate than his current campaign tone, he continues to face doubts about his authenticity from many Republicans, especially social conservatives.
Concern about his Mormon faith, again especially among social conservatives, has created another hurdle. (In a CBS poll [PDF] earlier this month, fully 51% of South Carolina Republican evangelicals expressed an unfavorable view of Mormonism.) Laboring under both sets of doubts, Romney has fallen behind Huckabee in Iowa and watched McCain dramatically reduce his long-standing advantage in New Hampshire.
Romney has counterattacked, fiercely portraying McCain as too liberal on taxes and immigration in New Hampshire and targeting Huckabee on those two issues in Iowa. Neither state is in Romney's grasp. But both remain within his reach, something no other Republican can say.
Romney might recognize, from his business school days, the dynamic that has provided him this opportunity. His competitors are trying to maximize their individual prospects by focusing on the states where they believe their chances are best. But the cumulative effect of those decisions is to threaten all of them by leaving nothing between Romney and potentially decisive victories in the first two contests except two underfunded (if charismatic and often compelling) opponents: McCain in New Hampshire and Huckabee in Iowa. It's "the prisoner's dilemma" applied to politics.
The result is that Romney now stands at the fulcrum of the Republican race. If Romney loses Iowa -- after massively outspending Huckabee -- the negative publicity could depress Romney's support in New Hampshire enough to allow McCain to pass him there, too. Then Romney would be grievously, probably fatally, wounded, and the Republican race wide open.
But Romney, alone among the contenders, still has a window of opportunity to consolidate a commanding advantage by winning both Iowa and New Hampshire. That would likely deny his rivals the financial infusions all of them will need to fully compete through the remaining January states and the avalanche of contests looming on Feb. 5.
To win the nomination, McCain, Thompson, Giuliani and even Huckabee all probably need someone to beat Romney early on. Only Romney holds his fate in his own hands. That's no guarantee of success, but candidates always prefer to control their own destiny. Romney is the last Republican who can still plausibly say that he does.
( Romney Is Betting Big To Win Big ) ... my prayers to GOD say otherwise, MITT ? your going to lose.... you can’t hold back the hand of GOD.
Mitt has the money and the ground game, but really has not “closed the sale” even with these advantages in Iowa and NH. If he uses his negative attack ads effectively enough to pull out victories, the annointed one from our power brokers of the party will probably survive and go on to win. A sad day in my mind for our party, as we will be handing the presidency over to Hillary on that day.
Mitt will not play well in the south and midwest, areas a Republican has to win in a presidential election. His “Clintonesque” statements will take the whole issue off the table if he is running against Hillary - who could actually claim to be more believable than Mitt in the general!
Oh yeah, one final thing. Only two persons running for office has 47% of the electorate already saying they will not vote for them - Hillary Clinton and Mitt Romney.
Sad isn't it? BTW, I'm one of the 47%.
I’m interested to see what you will have to say if Romney wins. I’d be more careful pretending to know the mind of God on matters such as this.
The more I look at the Republican field, the more I come to the conclusion that Romney is the guy. Not because I’m great guns for him, but because I think he is the only guy who can beat Hillary (or even Obama for that matter).
I think whoever the GOP nominee is this year, has an uphill battle. And, from what I’ve seen of Romney, he is the Robo candidate—a machine if I ever saw one. Normally, that turns me off; but, in this election, that is what is required.
The MSM wants McCain to get the nod very badly. I think the reason is ‘cause they know they can get him to meltdown in the general election. I don’t think Romney will.
Romney Fairy Tale:
www.ARTLaction.com
I think a great ticket would be Romney/Thompson (or vice versa).
If Romney would announce today that Duncan Hunter would be his Vice President he would automatically get the nod.
We as Americans/Conservatives/Christians must speak with one voice. We have a lot of people in America counting on Hillary to give them a free ride through life, just like she said she would do and they are waiting and willing to put the burden on your back.
I hope we get a GOP Candidate that can defeat the DEMS. To me that is the #1 Issue now.
The point is you seem to be claiming God doesn’t want Romney to win. If Romney wins, you’ll have to admit you were wrong about a pretty significant claim or that God’s will was defeated.
How do you figure that? Duncan Hunter is polling below 5 percent; Tancredo was doing better and dropped out and endorsed Romney already.
Excuse me. But does God have it in for Mormans?
I missed that somehow...
You should hide those, they are secret!
Correction:
You should hide those; they are secret.
:-P
Like I said, I am praying for Fred.... and what is your claim ? that Mitt will win ?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.