Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CharlesWayneCT; Saint Athanasius
No, you are in the way-back zone, where people post 2-year-old stories to misrepresent the facts.

So, please enlighten me, at what point do facts expire? Clearly, according to you, a fact is no longer a fact after 2 years. Tell me, is a fact still a fact after 1 year?

38 posted on 12/29/2007 6:01:14 PM PST by rhinohunter (Thompson/Steele '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: rhinohunter; big'ol_freeper

The facts are two years old.

The misrepresentation of the facts was done by the person who posted the article, where he wrote “More proof of Romney support for the Culture of Death.”

Romney does not support the culture of death, and that claim misrepresents the facts that are found in the article, which clearly states that Romney vetoed the legislation, and then tried to protect the hospitals after the legislation was passed.

he only switched because his legal counsel told him he’d lose the case because the law required the hospitals to dispense the medication — NOT because he supported the “culture of death”.

So my statement was exactly accurate — a 2-year-old story was posted so the poster could misrepresent the facts.

I don’t know why he couldn’t just find a more recent story that he could misrepresent. :-)


43 posted on 12/29/2007 9:11:14 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson