Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bushfamfan
You make a very strong argument for Hunter's nomination. I certainly agree that Fred Thompson's flaws make him unelectable, as I have posted here many times. He's the only candidate who can make the old, tired Hillary look young and fresh.

But I'm not sure I agree that Hunter's failure to progress is all MSM. Look at what the Paulestinians have accomplished. It's true that Ron Paul is strong up here in NH (by strong, I mean he might get 10%), but his people are EVERYWHERE up here, as are his signs, his phone calls, his doorknockers, etc.

By contrast, I have not gotten one call, one visit, seen one sign, or received one piece of mail from the Hunter forces. Not one.

That's not the fault of the MSM. That's the fault of the Hunter campaign, if there is one.

99 posted on 12/30/2007 5:47:09 AM PST by Jim Noble (Trails of trouble, roads of battle, paths of victory we shall walk.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]


To: Jim Noble

I strongly believe it is tied with the media. And the manipulation of people who learn of Hunter and like him best but are being led into this defeatist attitude of not giving him the support. The media is going to extremes to keep people from the knowledge of Hunter even being a candidate. But, like I say, Hunter is solid when he is given the coverage and is quick thinking and doesn’t stumble like the others. Best candidate by far. It would be the best thing if he overcame the media silence and got the GOP nomination because they really are in fear of him. He has the goods.


103 posted on 12/30/2007 6:15:40 AM PST by bushfamfan (DUNCAN HUNTER '08: the only candidate whose record matches his talk.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson