To: mtbopfuyn
In Skagit Co. WA during the last election cycle the dolts elected a Judge (D) that had a DUI and other driving issues. This judge that recently ruled to allow tainted state evidence in the prosecution of DUI cases. Other counties have ruled not to allow this evidence. My point is that a judge with a DUI history shouldn't’t be anywhere near any kind of DUI case. He sits on many DUI cases. If you were hauled up in front of a judge for a DUI wouldn't’t expect he didn’t have a DUI history? If he did wouldn’t you expect him recuse himself? During the campaign I called MADD’s HQ and asked what they thought about this potential judge. They said they didn’t have a position on judges with DUI's. What?? I’m just baffled.
310 posted on
12/28/2007 11:46:21 PM PST by
crabpott
(' we are living in the strangest, most perilous, and unbelievable decade in modern memory' VDH)
To: crabpott
During the campaign I called MADDs HQ and asked what they thought about this potential judge. They said they didnt have a position on judges with DUI's. What?? Im just baffled. Wanna get real baffled? Ask Headquarters if judges are routinely, randomly drug tested like the lowly worker drone at Walmart, or the security guard at Target.
To: crabpott
—”They said they didnt have a position on judges with DUI’s. What?? Im just baffled.”—
Ask them what their position is with their FOUNDER’S DUI!!!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson