Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sorry, Charlie. This Is Michael Vickers's War.
The Washington Post ^ | Dec 28, 2007 | Ann Scott Tyson

Posted on 12/28/2007 10:52:21 AM PST by RDTF

In the Pentagon's newly expanded Special Operations office, a suite of sterile gray cubicles on the "C" ring of the third floor, Assistant Secretary of Defense Michael G. Vickers is working to implement the U.S. military's highest-priority plan: a global campaign against terrorism that reaches far beyond Iraq and Afghanistan.

The wide-ranging plan details the targeting of al-Qaeda-affiliated networks around the world and explores how the United States should retaliate in case of another major terrorist attack.

-snip-

Vickers's job also spans the modernization of nuclear forces for deterrence and retaliation, and the retooling of conventional forces to combat terrorism -- a portfolio so expansive that he and some Pentagon officials once jokingly referred to his efforts as the "take-over-the-world plan," one official said.

Vickers, a former Green Beret and CIA operative, was the principal strategist for the biggest covert program in CIA history: the paramilitary operation that drove the Soviet army out of Afghanistan in the 1980s. The movie "Charlie Wilson's War," released last weekend, portrays Vickers in that role, in which he directed an insurgent force of 150,000 Afghan fighters and controlled an annual budget of more than $2 billion in current dollars.

Today, as the top Pentagon adviser on counterterrorism strategy, Vickers exudes the same assurance about defeating terrorist groups as he did as a 31-year-old CIA paramilitary officer assigned to Afghanistan, where he convinced superiors that with the right strategy and weapons, the ragtag Afghan insurgents could win. "I am just as confident or more confident we can prevail in the war on terror," Vickers, 54, said in a recent interview, looking cerebral behind thick glasses but with an energy and build reminiscent of the high school quarterback he once was. "Not a lot of people thought we could drive the Soviets out of Afghanistan."

-snip-

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: charliewilson; cia; michaelvickers; vickers

1 posted on 12/28/2007 10:52:22 AM PST by RDTF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RDTF

Lets face it, the only way to win the war on terror is through attrition.....thats it. Every other effort is futile.


2 posted on 12/28/2007 10:57:12 AM PST by AmericanGunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RDTF

Cry Havoc, and let slip the fighting dogs!

< Oh, different Michael Vick errrr... >


3 posted on 12/28/2007 10:57:41 AM PST by Hegemony Cricket (Although most dead people vote democrat, aborted babies, if given the choice, would vote Republican.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RDTF

He would be fired the first day of a ‘rat administration.


4 posted on 12/28/2007 10:57:45 AM PST by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericanGunner

Attrition is good if that’s the only strategy available. What you really need is a competitive ideology. These terrorists have a radical brand of Sunni Islam in common. Until you persuade them to give it up you’ll always have a large pool of recruits. That’s how you win.


5 posted on 12/28/2007 11:28:31 AM PST by Tallguy (Climate is what you plan for, weather is what you get.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy
Vickers is impatient with bureaucratic infighting within the military and between the Pentagon and other agencies, current and former officials said.

The understatement of the year.
6 posted on 12/28/2007 11:50:59 AM PST by BerryDingle (With friends like the media, who needs enemas ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RDTF
Finally, Vickers seeks authority for more flexible and rapid "detailing" that would allow Special Operations forces, in larger numbers, to be seconded to the CIA and allowed to work under agency rules.

Bad, very bad.

7 posted on 12/28/2007 11:59:23 AM PST by jveritas (God bless our brave troops and President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
Please elaborate on your ernestness against this idea.

Fast responses against know Al Qaeda/terrorist camps sounds like a good plan.

8 posted on 12/28/2007 3:51:46 PM PST by Michael.SF. ("democrat" -- 'one who panders to the crude and mindless whims of the masses " - Joseph J. Ellis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Michael.SF.
Do you really want the CIA to be in charge of anything in particular military special forces? the CIA is a political organization full of people who want to undermine the war at any cost.
9 posted on 12/28/2007 8:22:19 PM PST by jveritas (God bless our brave troops and President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
Do you really want the CIA to be in charge of anything in particular military special forces?

Don't you think they are already, to a certain extent?

the CIA is a political organization full of people who want to undermine the war at any cost.

True, Democrats are everywhere. But there are also some good people in the CIA.

10 posted on 12/30/2007 9:48:11 AM PST by Michael.SF. ("democrat" -- 'one who panders to the crude and mindless whims of the masses " - Joseph J. Ellis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson