I don’t know how lawyers even interview these people without pointing their finger at them and bursting into loud laughter
I’ve held my laughter, but I’ve thrown a lot of folks out of my office who brought in frivolous matters. This would have been one of those. “Just demand your money back and don’t shop there any more. That will be $50.00. Please see the receptionist on your way out.”
you have to wonder about the sleaze factor.
What about the chain of custody? How do you PROVE the child was the only one with the mp3 unit? Is there anyone else who had access to the mp3 unit? (siblings,boyfriends of mother,father,relatives)
What I suspect is you have a nusance factor here. The lawyer is just generating negative PR in order to generate the “go away” value.