My sentiments exactly.
If the Witch, Doofus, or Mr. Silky Pony Tail the "Baby Channeler" gets elected, its not my concern; well, yeah it is, but its not on my head.
The "exodus" from Free Republic had to do with a difference in opionion concenring "electability". Many left Free Republic becuase the expression of that opinion was quashed.
I don't give a rat's ass 'bout "electability" with concerm to "consequences".
I'm not going to vote for somebody just because they're "electable" and they're MORE in line than with my view points than not.
My non-naturalized parents have already made it clear that its either Thompson, or any of the donkey candidates.
While watching Law & Order, I stated that if I seen him on the general election ballot I'd vote for Thompson, and Dad immedieately asked "And what if he's not on the ballot? You'd vote for Hillary, or Oboma?". Of course Mom jumped in right away about how Romney is the most qualified candidate of all of them.
Of course they didn't have anything to respond concerning why McRomney is the qualified candidate contrasted to those I've mentioned. For what that's worth, Monica Lewinski has more "experience" in that regard (in the Oval Office and taking care of "Presidential business" than Shrillerary does). So what of it?
Silence.
I'm not threatening to vote U.S. Constitution Party, that's a "promise".
Don't vote for the candidate, vote for the party. If you don't like the candidate that the party is floating, vote U.S. Constitutino Party. Be a part of the U.S.A. political scene: send a message. A "third" party that gets more'n half percent "gets noticed".