Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: raygun
I would be happy if either Fred Thompson were to get the GOP nomination or Duncan Hunter, both men are the only 2 real conservatives in this race.
Duncan Hunter would make a great President if he gets the nomination, and if Fred Thompson gets the nomination, he also would make a great President.
In one of my post, all I was saying is ? that the RINOS got the MSM on their side, but, we ( Fred & Duncan ) got God's providence on our side.

Either or : Thompson/Hunter .. 2008 ...
Or : Hunter/Thompson .. 2008 ...
50 posted on 12/28/2007 2:17:20 AM PST by Prophet in the wilderness (PSALM .53 : 1 The FOOL hath said in his heart, there is no GOD.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: Prophet in the wilderness
Either or : Thompson/Hunter .. 2008 ... Or : Hunter/Thompson .. 2008 ...

My sentiments exactly.

53 posted on 12/28/2007 2:34:05 AM PST by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: Prophet in the wilderness
I want Hunter as the nominee. If I don't see a Hunter/Thompson or Thompson/Hunter along with Brownback/Huckabee/Romney/Paul/McCain/Giulanni as running-mate, then I willvote U.S. Constitution Party come the general election; "party" cohesiveness and "electability be damned.

If the Witch, Doofus, or Mr. Silky Pony Tail the "Baby Channeler" gets elected, its not my concern; well, yeah it is, but its not on my head.

The "exodus" from Free Republic had to do with a difference in opionion concenring "electability". Many left Free Republic becuase the expression of that opinion was quashed.

I don't give a rat's ass 'bout "electability" with concerm to "consequences".

I'm not going to vote for somebody just because they're "electable" and they're MORE in line than with my view points than not.

My non-naturalized parents have already made it clear that its either Thompson, or any of the donkey candidates.

While watching Law & Order, I stated that if I seen him on the general election ballot I'd vote for Thompson, and Dad immedieately asked "And what if he's not on the ballot? You'd vote for Hillary, or Oboma?". Of course Mom jumped in right away about how Romney is the most qualified candidate of all of them.

Of course they didn't have anything to respond concerning why McRomney is the qualified candidate contrasted to those I've mentioned. For what that's worth, Monica Lewinski has more "experience" in that regard (in the Oval Office and taking care of "Presidential business" than Shrillerary does). So what of it?

Silence.

I'm not threatening to vote U.S. Constitution Party, that's a "promise".

Don't vote for the candidate, vote for the party. If you don't like the candidate that the party is floating, vote U.S. Constitutino Party. Be a part of the U.S.A. political scene: send a message. A "third" party that gets more'n half percent "gets noticed".

90 posted on 12/30/2007 1:32:23 AM PST by raygun ("It is wrong always, everywhere, and for anyone to believe anything upon insufficient evidence")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson