Skip to comments.
Nanotechnology yields a breakthrough in battery life
Nanotechwire ^
| 12/27/2007
| Staff
Posted on 12/27/2007 11:43:25 PM PST by PeaceBeWithYou
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
To: PeaceBeWithYou
2
posted on
12/27/2007 11:45:46 PM PST
by
Maelstorm
(The first commandment of God "be ye fruitful, and multiply..")
To: PeaceBeWithYou
3
posted on
12/27/2007 11:53:59 PM PST
by
cherry
To: PeaceBeWithYou
Most excellent.
Technology marches onward.
4
posted on
12/28/2007 12:07:33 AM PST
by
Ronin
(Bushed out!!! Another tragic victim of BDS.)
To: PeaceBeWithYou
I hate to be a gloomy Gus...But in a way I hate reading stories about breakthroughs like this, because it seems to take forever before they hit the production lines.
I’ve been watching and waiting for several to actually jhit the market at a decent price point. If they ever come to market ar all. Still lookin for my 25’ roll-up OLED TV screen for years and years now. and haven’t seen anyone marketing electric and heat co-generator home systems that run off of the natural gas line...Yep! It’s proven tech...you can get heat, cookinf=g and Electricity from one very efficient and inexpensive appliance hooked to your gas line.
OLED TVs too. They’re putting out that dinky 10” screen for 2K...one of OLEDs major factors for replacing LCDs, is they are actually MUCH CHEAPER to make!
Well, amybe I’ll still be alive to see these batteries in the supermarket...but I doubt it.
(DGHoodini steps down from his soapbox.)
5
posted on
12/28/2007 12:14:18 AM PST
by
DGHoodini
(The Dems no longer have the humanity to grasp that there are things worth dying for.)
To: DGHoodini
CORRECTION: that was supposed to read: 25” roll-up OLED TV.
6
posted on
12/28/2007 12:20:00 AM PST
by
DGHoodini
(The Dems no longer have the humanity to grasp that there are things worth dying for.)
It’s amazing what science comes up with. Battery technology is important, but there are limited supplies of lithium available.
To: PeaceBeWithYou
8
posted on
12/28/2007 12:35:47 AM PST
by
dadgum
(Jesus, The Christ, will return soon. Are you ready?)
To: DGHoodini
I am still waiting for my personal jetpack and hovercar.
9
posted on
12/28/2007 12:45:19 AM PST
by
LukeL
To: Albert Guérisse
Between Gore & Paul, they should be able to spare enough.
10
posted on
12/28/2007 1:31:32 AM PST
by
DGHoodini
(The Dems no longer have the humanity to grasp that there are things worth dying for.)
To: LukeL
11
posted on
12/28/2007 1:32:32 AM PST
by
DGHoodini
(The Dems no longer have the humanity to grasp that there are things worth dying for.)
To: PeaceBeWithYou
Maybe this will shut up the crowd thats been boo-hooing the electric car.
This makes really some good news, everyone has had the mindset that batteries will always be big, bulky and expensive, not so! Battery technology is advancing faster than computer CPU speed was in the mid 90’s.
To: Maelstorm
If this is true 20X the energy density of existing Lithium Ion batteries, then this should put electric vehicle’s in showrooms.
Ironically, the liberals will be really ticked, since we will all be able to still drive Hummers.
13
posted on
12/28/2007 1:49:17 AM PST
by
NavVet
(If you don't defend conservatism in the Primary, you won't have it to defend in the Election)
To: PeaceBeWithYou
To: PeaceBeWithYou
15
posted on
12/28/2007 3:33:16 AM PST
by
BJungNan
To: BJungNan
16
posted on
12/28/2007 4:18:46 AM PST
by
Normandy
To: Eye of Unk
Maybe this will shut up the crowd thats been boo-hooing the electric car.
The Tesla Roadster concept is pretty well supported here. I like full size sedans (Electra, Olds 98, Imperial, Town Car), which will probably be the last recipients of electric technology, but if this technology can increase the range of the Tesla five fold, then itis completely viable ON ITS OWN TERMS, that is irrespective of whether it cuts pollution or reduces oil dependency. That is the key to success.
I do wonder how long it would take to recharge the nano-li-ion Tesla with a range of 800 miles.
17
posted on
12/28/2007 4:48:34 AM PST
by
Dr. Sivana
(Not a newbie, I just wanted a new screen name.)
To: Albert Guérisse
"Its amazing what science comes up with. Battery technology is important, but there are limited supplies of lithium available." Not true-there is more lithium around than we'll ever need. And, just like lead in batteries currently, it will mostly be recycled.
To: Dr. Sivana
That is the key to success. You also have to add in the usable life of the batteries, too. If you're going to have to spend $15K in 5-8 years to replace them, there isn't much advantage.
We'll be seeing truly competitive, viable electric commuter cars within about 5 years, though....and the 0-60 mph performance will be "blistering".......
19
posted on
12/28/2007 5:19:30 AM PST
by
Thermalseeker
(Debates? Those weren't no stinkin' debates!)
To: DGHoodini
I hate to be a gloomy Gus...But in a way I hate reading stories about breakthroughs like this, because it seems to take forever before they hit the production lines. Usually they never hit the production line, because there is some major drawback that is never mentioned in the press releases.
20
posted on
12/28/2007 5:29:40 AM PST
by
Moonman62
(The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson