[mnehring]

I disagree that he would oppose it because amending the Constitution is Constitutional, plus, even though he prefers this be a “State” issue, he still has voted 100% pro-life on federal restrictions. IE, his record shows he is a Federalist who will still support any restriction on abortion.

[Sola Veritas]

“I disagree that he would oppose it because amending the Constitution...”

In an interview he gave during his surge, he said clearly that he thought it was a state’s right to determine if they wanted homosexual marriage or not...he said even if he Fred Thompson disagreed with them. He is a true federalist. People have rightfully said that Fred is not wishy washy. When it comes to “states rights”, he is not wishy washy. He would not be for ammending the constitution, even to end something he personnally objected to.

[Sola Veritas]

“I disagree that he would oppose it because amending the Constitution...”

In an interview he gave during his surge, he said clearly that he thought it was a state’s right to determine if they wanted homosexual marriage or not...he said even if he Fred Thompson disagreed with them. He is a true federalist. People have rightfully said that Fred is not wishy washy. When it comes to “states rights”, he is not wishy washy. He would not be for ammending the constitution, even to end something he personnally objected to.