*** Ok, I guess, I'm totally lost and confused. It sounds like we are on the same page? I did read Jim's post and I also have the same wishful thinking that a social conservative can still be elected to the Presidency. Obviously Jim has not use for "lawyers". Oh, my God! Rudy is a lawyer! I guess all lawyers are fools, dishonest, liberal, and liars? That offends me more than you do.
I’m offended by your suggestion that I refrain from posting my opinion on this site. ***And I’m offended by this post: “if you do not vote for Rudy then you are sitting in the center of the isle. Hillary should send you a thank you card for dropping out of the election.” We have a special bugzapper thread for RINOs like you:
If you think that Huckabee can get elected then you also believe that Jesus will return before Hillary completely suppresses Christian morality. I would love to see a pro-life president elected, but all he or she can do is appoint another Justice like Roberts. That would be a blessing. You are apparently offended by my stating that Huckabee is far to the right (where I am actually) and Rudy is far to the left (where I wish the votes were not) Obviously non of us even RINO's don't want Hillary, so the way I see it brother is that we have to choose between the lesser of two undesirables. You've never had to do that then you have lost some battles and this is one battal I do not want to loose.
see my post: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1947195/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1821435/posts So my suggestion that you refrain from posting was actually good advice. If you continue to post such drivel, it’s likely you’ll suffer the same fate as all those other impolite rudybots on the bugzapper thread. Read it and come up to speed before you post any more.
Rudybots? How is that supposed to inform me of anything other than you are completely opposed to reason?
I trust that no one’s faith in Huckabee is threatened by some truthful facts? ***Red Herring I suppose you have enough knowlege of law school that you know this is a term used by first year law students. Should I assume you are one of the bad guys? ie: lawyers?
I like Duncan, but unfortunately he is not doing well in the race. ***Typical RINO response, like a banker who will only lend money to someone who doesn’t need it. But Hunter supporters notice that when it comes to other candidates, the first part of the sentence is usually less charitable. Hunter is becoming the consensus candidate by means of such patronizing.
Keep praying for our country. Election day is not Sunday school goers.
I had a response drawn out but it did not get posted and now it’s lost. So my response this time will be more simple.
Ok, I guess, I’m totally lost and confused. It sounds like we are on the same page?
***Not to me, it looks like you’re just deflecting again.
I did read Jim’s post and I also have the same wishful thinking that a social conservative can still be elected to the Presidency. Obviously Jim has not use for “lawyers”. Oh, my God! Rudy is a lawyer! I guess all lawyers are fools, dishonest, liberal, and liars? That offends me more than you do.
***Then take it up with Jim.
If you think that Huckabee can get elected then you also believe that Jesus will return before Hillary completely suppresses Christian morality.
***This statement is a pure non-sequitur. It does not make sense. More deflection.
I would love to see a pro-life president elected, but all he or she can do is appoint another Justice like Roberts.
***We saw that so much with tootyfruitybots that many of us freepers were convinced they were talking points. It’s baloney. If you can read JimRob’s definition of conservative and then print that same statement, you are not a conservative.
That would be a blessing. You are apparently offended by my stating that Huckabee is far to the right (where I am actually) and Rudy is far to the left (where I wish the votes were not)
***No, I’m offended that you suggest I’m sitting in the aisle. Most of free republic is sitting in the aisle if tootyfruityrudy is nominated.
Obviously non of us even RINO’s don’t want Hillary, so the way I see it brother is that we have to choose between the lesser of two undesirables.
***Standard tootyfruityrudy talking points. Baloney. It’s also a false dilemma, classic fallacious reasoning. You’re not much of a lawyer if you’re still using classic fallacies. Why do you acknowledge you’re a RINO?
You’ve never had to do that then you have lost some battles and this is one battal I do not want to loose.
***Justification for your false dilemma reasoning.
see my post: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1947195/posts
***Standard RINO single-issue stuff. The single issue is Hillary. But then the RINOs disregard that in a recent poll, the top 4 Republican candidates all beat the Hildebeast. Anyone can beat her. So you should be happy.
Rudybots? How is that supposed to inform me of anything other than you are completely opposed to reason?
***That’s a form of straw argumentation. We freepers saw how little reason was used by tootyfruityrudybots in the end, and it was just another piece of baloney from them.
Red Herring I suppose you have enough knowlege of law school that you know this is a term used by first year law students. Should I assume you are one of the bad guys? ie: lawyers?
***No. It’s a classic use of an arguing/debating/reasoning term. It means you’re deflecting. Noticing a pattern yet?
Keep praying for our country. Election day is not Sunday school goers.
***I agree.