Please point out to me where Paul blamed America for this. FReepers Puddlegum and FreeinWV already shot this down earlier in the thread.
They didnt kill Bhutto because of America. They killed her because she wanted reform.
So Paul didn't address this. But he did point out the rank stupidity of us giving billions of dollars to a corrupt military dictator like Musharraf. He does get a gold star from the Paul critics who'll bitch no matter what he says, right?
I notice that you sidestepped the rest of my post so Ill repeat it: what Paul said will have bearing on the jihadis who will use it in their training videos to jack up hatred of America.
Please stop with the hyperbole. You have no way of knowing what's going to happen whether or not we leave the Middle East immediately or stay there for a hundreds years. Either way there's going to be terrorism and jihadism.
And the knee jerk reaction from that quarter will likely be a few more IEDs targeting our our troops who are out protecting his right to run off at the mouth.
I don't see any knee-jerking here from Paul. He made a statement which I expected from his point of view. The problem with you and others, is that you're already predispositioned to Paul and any statement he makes is "moonbatty." I prefer to do some research and analyze what he means.
Is it possible that Ron Paul is saying exactly what he means?
Why do you find it necessary to analyze what he said? Can't his words stand up to plain meaning?
Your support of your own candidate doesn't even fall under the heading of "faint praise". You just step up and slam him by suggesting that everything he says needs to be "parsed" to determine it's true meaning.
Even his supporters are starting to implode.