Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lady lawyer

Any of the republican wannabees is preferable to Hillary or B. Hussein Obama. In fact Mitt would be better than everyone except Fred and Duncan Hunter...but Fred & Duncan don’t appear to have a shot. I hope that changes.


49 posted on 12/26/2007 12:41:45 PM PST by Mogollon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Mogollon

“Any of the republican wannabees is preferable to Hillary or B. Hussein Obama. In fact Mitt would be better than everyone except Fred and Duncan Hunter...but Fred & Duncan don’t appear to have a shot. I hope that changes.”

He’s no Rudy. Mitt wouldn’t destroy the party,...that’s probably the best thing I can say about him running. Rudy is the worst candidate on our side and would shatter the right.


57 posted on 12/26/2007 12:45:35 PM PST by Rick_Michael (The Anti-Federalists failed....so will the Anti-Frederalists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: Mogollon
Actually, since this is from Newsmax, I think the pro-Romney article is a way to get a Clinton elected. Didn't the Newsmax owner become a born-again Clinonista?

By the way,one doesn't have to have a religious bias to see that Mitt Romney ain't no conservative, and calling him on it and not wanting a person who's faking whatever at the moment to get elected as President doesn't make one a bigot.

Unless we're just left to politics of personal destruction because the facts aren't on your side.

101 posted on 12/26/2007 1:21:33 PM PST by elk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson