He didn’t “endorse” them, he said it should be up to states to decide.
Do you think the federal government should forbid states from making their own rules on this matter?
MR. RUSSERT: You said (in 1994) that you would sponsor (Sen. Ted Kennedy’s federal) Employment Nondiscrimination Act. Do you still support it?
GOV. ROMNEY: At the state level. I think it makes sense at the state level for states to put in provision of this.
First, Romney clearly throughout his career was an advocate of homosexual activists’ current (at the time) political agenda. Even boasted in 1994 that he’d be more effective than Kennedy at implementing it. Same year, he endorsed federal “sexual orientation” law and gays in the military.
In 2002, he opposed a state Marriage Protection Amendment, then flipped on the issue. The charge, Charles, has been obvious: he’s flip-flopped on a plethora of issues that for people on both sides involve core inner values. Indicating that he has none.
So he endorses the feds forcing every employer in America to hire individuals openly involved in homosexual behavior.
He supports the state law doing the same in Massachusetts.
Then he flips on the federal, but clearly says last week that he thinks “it makes sense at the state level for states to put in provision of this”...
And you claim he only meant they should have the right to do so.
Show me in plain English where he said that, Charles.
He expressed his personal view that “it makes sense” for states to make homosexual behavior the moral, social, and legal equivalent of immutable characteristics such as race, color, and sex.
Snap out of it, man. This guy’s got you in some sort of trance.