To: devane617
If they said it was legal and then it was not legal, then this is a taking of property entitled to compensation.
Taking of property does not mean just land, there is property of the intellect, property of the person, property of the conscience etc.
He would have a takings claim.
19 posted on
12/26/2007 9:05:20 AM PST by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: longtermmemmory; Aut Pax Aut Bellum
If they said it was legal and then it was not legal, then this is a taking of property entitled to compensation.
For those not aware, ATF makes rulings, which are not law, and then enforces them. This is what bothers me...
If this guy had access to legal resources and written documentation to their statement that authorized production of his device, his case might single-handedly take down the BATF.
53 posted on
12/26/2007 10:06:14 AM PST by
RandallFlagg
(Satisfaction was my sin)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson