I find it interesting that despite the headline, in the article she does not actually come right out and say “abortion IS murder.” Instead she only allows that it is a “TYPE of murder.” Just an observation about how she seems to need to play linguistic games with herself and with the world, compulsively sticking in qualifiers to dilute the impact of what she’s saying.
I wonder what “type” she thinks it is? (besides “acceptable,” of course!) How would she categorize other “types” of murder? Does she approve or disapprove of those other “types” based on the impact on the quality of life for the murderer? Or is it really more dependent for her on the “type” of victim chosen?
Abortionists will NEVER acknowledge that ALL abortion is the taking of innocent human life and therefore murder.
At their core, you will always find the eugenicist attitude that some lives are "more worthy" of living than others. The culture of death will always push this view, though sometimes more blatantly than others. The Nazis were very open in their belief that the Jews, Gypsies and other groups did not deserve life, Margaret Sanger and Planned Parenthood targeted the poor and minorities, the enviornmentalists/global warming alarmists believe that only the elites deserve full access to the world's resources. And, a woman going into the abortuary has decided that her "life" is worth more than her unborn child's, though by life she generally means her imagined "right" to not be inconvenienced by the consequences of her own decisions.