The only thing that is obvious and objective, is that there is a bookcase in the shot. The interpretation of a cross is entirely subjective, unless you consider any two intersecting lines to be representative of the Christian Cross, which would be ridiculous.
"...the shot was intentionally manipulated to insert the Cross using the "accidental" bookcase in the background.
And you have what evidence to support this...other than your own imagination?
Here's a clue...if you have to resort to inserting conspiracies to maintain your hypothesis, then chances are your hypothesis is wrong.
I am not sure how they can not see it, but they maintain that they can not, and I have no choice but to accept that.
How noble of you.
Keeping in the spirit of things, I'm not sure how anybody can not see a mathematical symbol....or cross-hairs...or even a rolling swastika (which is what the effect of camera panning was meant to suggest....wink, wink, nod, nod)
Why, throw in a bookcase without books and the suggestion of fire (surely thee must be a fireplace in such an elegant room, and if not, then the Christmas season alone is enough to suggest one) and you have your Nazi agenda right there....
I suggested nothing of the sort. The only thing I suggested is the obvious, that the shot was staged to highlight the front edges of that bookshelf to form a cross. I did not mention any of the other things you suggest.
If you want to argue with me, argue with things that I have said, not with things that I have not said. Otherwise, you run the risk of looking like somebody who does not want to discuss things but rather just shouts people down.