Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mobile Vulgus

It would be refreshing to see an attack on Romney that references something newer than 1994, but one hardly ever does.


55 posted on 12/25/2007 6:31:51 PM PST by Dan Middleton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Dan Middleton

He lied about having the endorsement of the NRA. That was this month.


61 posted on 12/25/2007 6:32:58 PM PST by Petronski (Willard Myth Romney: 47% negatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

To: Dan Middleton
It would be refreshing to see an attack on Romney that references something newer than 1994, but one hardly ever does.
And WHY is that do you think? It's because he has NO RECORD of political interest before that!!! He went from spending MOST of his life uninterested in politics, then was a liberal for most of his political life, and the last year he has SUDDENLY "become: a conservative. His record is HORRIBLE!
65 posted on 12/25/2007 6:35:08 PM PST by Mobile Vulgus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

To: Dan Middleton
It would be refreshing to see an attack on Romney that references something newer than 1994, but one hardly ever does.

Amen!

154 posted on 12/25/2007 8:39:13 PM PST by Edit35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson