Skip to comments.
Romney and Huckabee on the Right to Life: $50 Abortions versus $35K from Stem Cell Research Company
Vanity
| 12/25/2007
Posted on 12/25/2007 2:34:26 PM PST by Brices Crossroads
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-106 next last
To: MHGinTN
That doesn’t help their position.
41
posted on
12/25/2007 5:27:19 PM PST
by
Petronski
(Willard Myth Romney: 47% negatives)
To: Brices Crossroads
I notice you don’t address the fact that people who pay a monthly premium for health insurance in other states are also paying for abortion...at least according to your definition.
Perhaps even you are subsidizing other people’s abortions. Have you checked what your plan covers?
42
posted on
12/25/2007 5:27:46 PM PST
by
bw17
To: Petronski
I forget, are prostitutes public businesses in Massatwosh!ts?
43
posted on
12/25/2007 5:28:37 PM PST
by
MHGinTN
(Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
To: bw17
That’s not narcissistic self-importance.
I suggest you look up the terms before using them.
44
posted on
12/25/2007 5:28:38 PM PST
by
Petronski
(Willard Myth Romney: 47% negatives)
To: Petronski
I suggest you look up the terms, and then report back to me.
45
posted on
12/25/2007 5:31:05 PM PST
by
bw17
To: bw17
46
posted on
12/25/2007 5:32:21 PM PST
by
Petronski
(Willard Myth Romney: 47% negatives)
To: bw17
“I notice you dont address the fact that people who pay a monthly premium for health insurance in other states are also paying for abortion.”
Wrong. People in every other state can either purchase a plan that does not cover abortion or not buy a plan at all. In Massachusetts, under RomneyCare, every taxpayer must belong to a plan and every plan must cover abortion on demand.
To: bw17
I notice you dont address the fact that people who pay a monthly premium for health insurance in other states are also paying for abortion...MANDATED by the government?
Nope.
48
posted on
12/25/2007 5:36:54 PM PST
by
Petronski
(Willard Myth Romney: 47% negatives)
To: Petronski
"Done. Im right."
---------------------------------------------------------
LOL. Instead of a definition, you posted an example of narcissistic self-importance. Very well done. /thumbsup
49
posted on
12/25/2007 5:41:55 PM PST
by
bw17
To: Brices Crossroads
Did you look at your own plan?
50
posted on
12/25/2007 5:42:24 PM PST
by
bw17
To: bw17
The real narcissism is your command that I report back to you.
LOL. As if.
51
posted on
12/25/2007 5:43:17 PM PST
by
Petronski
(Willard Myth Romney: 47% negatives)
To: bw17
...you posted an example of narcissistic self-importance.P.S. You still don't know what the term means.
52
posted on
12/25/2007 5:44:37 PM PST
by
Petronski
(Willard Myth Romney: 47% negatives)
To: bw17
Don’t try and bring Reagan into this further to cover Mitt’s tracks, your peers have done that and I called them on their BS as well. I give you guys one shot on using Reagan and then I call you on it.
Lying about Reagan to cover the ass of a man who, as an active republican, dismissed his policies will win you no points on this Conservative site. You should know better, you are not a newbie.
If, and it's a big one even without Fred in the mix, if he wins, I will deal. I will watch him like a hawk, expect the worst, invest my money accordingly and if he surprises me, great, if not, as I have said before, it took a Carter to get Reagan, so we may well be on our way.
As far as the 11th Commandment, it applied to Republicans back when the Republican party was fully Conservative. It now only applies to fellow Conservatives.
53
posted on
12/25/2007 5:53:51 PM PST
by
ejonesie22
(In America all people have a right to be wrong, some just exercise it a bit much...)
To: Brices Crossroads
Another flip-flop, another lie. I’m going to have a hard time voting for Romney in the General Election if he gets the GOP nod.
54
posted on
12/25/2007 5:56:14 PM PST
by
no dems
(FRED THOMPSON: The only Conservative running who can beat Hillary or Obama.)
To: bw17
BTW I did not miss the whole Fred bit at the end. It is just I don’t want to draw attention to the same sort of Fred bashing bull$hit that got you buddies banned. I want you guys here to enjoy...
55
posted on
12/25/2007 5:57:15 PM PST
by
ejonesie22
(In America all people have a right to be wrong, some just exercise it a bit much...)
To: MHGinTN
They come in under the same rules as politicians there. Professional courtesy...
56
posted on
12/25/2007 5:59:11 PM PST
by
ejonesie22
(In America all people have a right to be wrong, some just exercise it a bit much...)
To: ejonesie22
"If, and it's a big one even without Fred in the mix, if he wins, I will deal. I will watch him like a hawk, expect the worst, invest my money accordingly and if he surprises me, great, if not, as I have said before, it took a Carter to get Reagan, so we may well be on our way."
------------------------------------------------------------
As I pointed out earlier, pursuing a scorched-Earth policy against Romney only helps the Democrats. It will not help get Fred elected.
57
posted on
12/25/2007 5:59:42 PM PST
by
bw17
To: bw17
Keeping the nomination from Slick Willard’s hands helps all conservatives.
58
posted on
12/25/2007 6:00:32 PM PST
by
Petronski
(Willard Myth Romney: 47% negatives)
To: bw17; All
Since I did not say that, I guess I can laugh.
Car insurance is apples and oranges, driving is a privilege, you don’t have to do it if you don’t want to buy insurance. You are only forced to do so if you decided to operate a car.
With the health insurance people are given NO choice, even a bad one.
59
posted on
12/25/2007 6:01:37 PM PST
by
ejonesie22
(In America all people have a right to be wrong, some just exercise it a bit much...)
To: bw17
“As I pointed out earlier, pursuing a scorched-Earth policy against Romney only helps the Democrats. It will not help get Fred elected.”
Keep the polls that show Romney doing well now for your scrap book. They are just name recognition polls, but they are as close as he is going to get to the nomination and to the White House. They will however be suitable for framing.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-106 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson