Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Perdogg

FR’s own Joseph Shahda, whose translations of the Harmony documents have been posted here, can independently corroborate much of this. While Loftus alone may be questionable, the preponderance of circumstantial evidence alone seems impressive to make the case.


51 posted on 12/24/2007 6:36:18 PM PST by sono (Washington, DC. You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: sono

http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=F715A709-2614-4EA5-967C-F6151F94A364


53 posted on 12/24/2007 6:37:24 PM PST by pookie18
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

To: sono
Loftus is incorrect. It was the Dems who based on a trumped up allegation of security leaks demanded that Saddams papers be pulled off the internet. People like Jvaritas were beginning to piece together information that didn't fit the template.

? When have Dems ever been interested in maintaining security secrets?

I think they were more worried about names like Bonir and McDermott being mentioned in Saddams scribblings.

113 posted on 12/24/2007 9:04:31 PM PST by gov_bean_ counter ( Who is America's George Galloway?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson