As evidenced by your gratuitous assertion without factual analysis?
Why 2010? What makes that year so important?
What constitutes "serious stability"? A valid case could be made that both countries are more "stable" now than ever before in their histories.
Forgive me if I ignore your assumed premise and just proceed with the realization that you don't know much about anything.
****However if there isn’t continued improvement in Iraq and Afghanistan and some serious stability by 2010 than a serious reassessment of the methods being used in this war will needed.
As evidenced by your gratuitous assertion without factual analysis?
Why 2010? What makes that year so important?
What constitutes “serious stability”? A valid case could be made that both countries are more “stable” now than ever before in their histories.
Forgive me if I ignore your assumed premise and just proceed with the realization that you don’t know much about anything.****
2010 is just a date I selected it over eight years since troops first went into Afghanistan approximately twice the US participation in WW2.
What is stability you ask well I would say stability is situation on a regular month to month basis no more than a couple of allied soldiers are lost.
You say it might be more stable now than ever. Maybe it is than at what point do we quit putting Canadian, British, Australian, Polish, Ukrainian, American and all other troops at risk.
And finally because you are too lazy intellectually to debate the facts you launch a personal attack on me.