Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: org.whodat; Jack Wilson
Were they met in this case?

Yes, there was a brick are rock wall that everyone assumed was the property line for all these years. It wasn't but had been there long enough to meet the legal requirements to establish a new line. Some people just want to be in the pitch fork crowd.

Wrong, the legal qualifications were not met. You are citing an earlier, completely different case.

31 posted on 12/24/2007 11:39:10 AM PST by tarheelswamprat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: tarheelswamprat
Wrong, the legal qualifications were not met. You are citing an earlier, completely different case.

Where did you get your degree in real estate??? The Judge said they were met, file an appeal are get off of it.

33 posted on 12/24/2007 11:41:43 AM PST by org.whodat (What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: tarheelswamprat
"Last year, when the Kirlins tried to put up a fence on the property line, McLean and his wife filed for a temporary restraining order. Then they filed a lawsuit under the doctrine of adverse possession, which says a person can gain possession of property after using it without a challenge by the owner for a certain period. In Colorado, the time frame is 18 years."
34 posted on 12/24/2007 11:49:05 AM PST by org.whodat (What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson