Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: baybabe
Your other counterparts who oppose the FairTax stipulated the 9%. Whether you did or not doesn’t matter.

LOL!

Many of the FairTax supporters felt the reduction would be greater but to move the discussion along also settled on using the 9%.

Oh, they felt. Well, I couldn't ask for more proof than that.

I’ve been lurking for a long time and only recently started posting so I had no screenname to use on earlier threads.

LOL!

What have you calculated your effective FairTax rate to be?

For medical services, my rate rises from 1.45% to 30%. Great deal for me!

811 posted on 01/16/2008 9:26:06 AM PST by Toddsterpatriot (What came first, the bad math or the FairTaxery?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 810 | View Replies ]


To: Toddsterpatriot
1.45%??? Nothing of the sort. Read #807 again. Your effective tax rate right now is FAR more than either that or than what it wold be under the FairTax.

Does “LOL” mean “Lick Our Lollipop”???

There were many discussions offering numerical analysis as to why the believed it should more while you’ve offered no such thing except to state an obviously wildly erroneous effective income tax rate. Talk about proof!!!

And as pointed out, your effective tax rate under the FairTax is less than under the income tax.

812 posted on 01/16/2008 9:58:31 AM PST by baybabe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 811 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson