Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Toddsterpatriot
I answered your original example which was $100 including the tax so I certainly wans’t “afraid” at all. You seem to not wish to know what the cost (as opposed to price at point of sale) might be by taking your effective tax rate into account.

If you do that - which is the true cost to you - the example has quite a different result as I showed you, reducing the $100 cost down to $85.56. You seem to not understand that ... or not wish to.

782 posted on 01/11/2008 1:33:54 PM PST by baybabe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 775 | View Replies ]


To: baybabe
I answered your original example which was $100 including the tax so I certainly wans’t “afraid” at all.

No, because my original example was $100, before any tax was added. I'm glad you've overcome your fear.

You seem to not wish to know what the cost (as opposed to price at point of sale)

I was asking specifically about the price at point of sale.

785 posted on 01/11/2008 2:32:02 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (What came first, the bad math or the FairTaxery?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 782 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson