A lot of this stuff is coming out of the blogs and places like Free Republic.
We had 8 years of a "Liar in Chief". We don't need one on our side.
IF Romney has been lying about his political resume (and he has), then we need to get the truth out now... before we see a November 2008 meltdown.
No. This stuff is coming from DNC / MSM and reported in places like FR. One liberal ragtag from NH (Concord) was used as a credible source, now this. lol
Wall Street Journal:
“Democrats know it. Here’s an interesting statistic: Since the beginning of 2007, the Democratic National Committee has released 102 direct attacks on Mitt Romney. Rudy Giuliani has warranted 78; John McCain 68; Fred Thompson 21.”
“IF Romney has been lying about his political resume (and he has)”
No he hasn’t. He described his father as a Civil Rights leader, which he was:
http://occidentalvalues.blogspot.com/2007/12/george-romney-and-martin-luther-king.html
“If in fact thorough research (which will take some time) shows that either 1) Romney and King did march together or 2)These historians and reporters were citing each other on a mistaken fact as to the June 23, 1963 march, the fact remains that George Romney did indeed lead a march for Civil Rights (whether or not King was with him at the time) and that George Romney was a Civil Rights leader in general and that he marched in solidarity with King in immediate response to Selma—the most defining Civil Rights episode of the era.”
What we dont need is to fall for gotcha politics to such a degree that a man is called a liar for stating things remembered by witnesses and written up as fact in multiple history books. The Romney campaign made the correct clarification already.