1 posted on
12/23/2007 1:06:10 PM PST by
george76
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; sukhoi-30mki; BIGLOOK; Robert A. Cook, PE; G8 Diplomat; F15Eagle; Doohickey
fourth conversion of a U.S. nuclear ballistic missile submarine
2 posted on
12/23/2007 1:08:15 PM PST by
george76
(Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
To: george76
So what happens when the Chinese knock out the GPS satellies. What is the backup navigation for these missles?
3 posted on
12/23/2007 1:15:35 PM PST by
Oatka
(A society of sheep must in time beget a government of wolves." –Bertrand de Jouvenel)
To: george76
Not sure at all how I feel about this.
Of all of the elements of our TRIAD, the subs are by far the most important.
But I don’t have current numbers.
4 posted on
12/23/2007 1:16:46 PM PST by
bill1952
(The right to buy weapons is the right to be free)
To: george76
Wow. One sub could put a cruise missile through the bedroom window of 154 mullahs all at once. Sweet.
12 posted on
12/23/2007 1:32:08 PM PST by
EternalVigilance
(For America's Revival - www.AlanKeyes.com)
To: george76; AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; ...
14 posted on
12/23/2007 1:34:47 PM PST by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________Profile updated Sunday, December 23, 2007)
To: george76
19 posted on
12/23/2007 1:57:05 PM PST by
Kevmo
(We should withdraw from Iraq — via Tehran. And Duncan Hunter is just the man to get that job done.)
To: george76
I think at least the AF recently conducted a test bombing run using different aiming methods than GPS.
I wonder if these submarines could launch long range UAVs that could perform several tasks. They would probably have to be expendable.
To: george76
I think the optimum statement here is, “emerging threat from China.”
26 posted on
12/23/2007 2:53:52 PM PST by
Joe Boucher
(An enemy of Islam)
To: george76
154 long-range cruise missiles
MAN!!!!...My little ole boat carried squat hahaha...dang ...that weapons load would take 3 days at the rate we loaded ;D
To: george76
29 posted on
12/23/2007 3:39:32 PM PST by
tubebender
(Lost another one to the Tag Line bandit...)
To: george76
Converting SSBNs into SSGNs is sheer stupidity. The USN will ultimately regret this foolhardy idea after the ChiComs take out our satellites in the next world war.
32 posted on
12/23/2007 4:28:02 PM PST by
Virginia Ridgerunner
(“We must not forget that there is a war on and our troops are in the thick of it!” --Duncan Hunter)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson