Posted on 12/23/2007 11:57:40 AM PST by saveliberty
:-) Merry Christmas, Bahbah!
You are most welcome!
I would like to know why my ban was not removed when it was supposed to have been? My ban was only supposed to last until yesteray morning December 22 2007 07:13:31 which I assume is pst time. I am in central time so it should have expired at the latest by 9:30 am cst.
It seams to me that when a ban is scheduled up to a certain time it should be lifted when the time comes the ban is supposed to end
LOL
Did you know that Reason interviewed Ronald Reagan in 1975?
http://www.reason.com/news/show/29318.html
Mods are probably off on their Christmas vacation.
Sorry, did I have a formatting issue?
You have a point there — Snow’s remark could be interpreted as an undeserved slight on the previous Republican Congress. I doubt that was Snow’s intent, though.
Did I miss something? I looked to see if this had been posted previously and did not see it listed.
From the beginning, I thought it was a bad career move for him It was going to cost him his credibility and it did.
I cant stand him either now.
I still want to know what happened to the Barrett Report ..??
Tony was so hot-to-trot about that issue prior to his WH job - but the moment he landed there - all talk about the Barrett Report ceased. I remember Tony stated he had been allowed to read a few pages and they were bombshells.
But .. Tony must have found out how many repubs were also involved in the Barrett Report and there’s no REPUBLICAN with guts enough to blow the whistle.
Too bad - it’s caused me to stop supporting the repubs with my money. They still call me .. but I never answer.
And .. when the repubs whine about the NYT spiking a story .. it’s like the pot calling the kettle black .. because the House and Senate repubs have spiked the Barrett Report.
Until they release that Report - in it’s entirety - I will never support any of them again with my money.
And his statements during the intense battles that President Bush fought against us only reinforced that perception.
The President's incredibly bombastic remarks did not alter that perception one whit
-see you at the signing ...
Thank you, ThreePuttinDude!
That’s the “REDACTED” version which the dems insisted upon - proving my point.
The FULL version has never been released because NO REPUBLICAN HAS THE COURAGE TO BLOW THE WHISTLE ON THE GARBAGE RUNNING OUR GOVT. And .. all it takes is for ONE REPUBLICAN to ask for a FULL copy - and then HE/SHE can release it to the public. There is nothing to stop any congress person from doing that - except they’re all cowards.
I still say it’s because they don’t want to be excluded from all the rounds of dinners and cocktail parties.
I’m sick of them all - including Tony.
Sadly I must agree with you. I think he sold out and now he's back to playing the conservative because that's where he can make some money. I'm glad he's feeling better but I wouldn't walk across the street to hear him speak anymore.
How did Tony Snowa 52-year-old movement conservative brought on board by a conservative administration to revive a conservative agendawin over the liberal media?
By being smarter than they ever could be! They aren't called...by Tony...the "Has-Been" media for nothing!
Well the usual BS from the usual collection of pseudo intellectual that populate the Junk Media. They never ask any "tough questions". What they do is ask manufactured PR questions spun them by the Democrat National Committee designed to future a particular partisan political agenda no matter the cost to fact or their intellectual credibility. Tony was simply a master of pointing out the fraudulent premises, and intellectual dishonesty of the questions posed by supposed "Journalists"
Did you ever bother to consider, even for a heart beat, that ALL your sources of information on this case are totally biased towards a particular political agenda which they are advancing by shamelessly exploiting this case in the most one side, intellectually dishonest fashion possible?
Ever wonder why every time the case is reviewed it is upheld? When Congress investigated it they could find no corruption in this prosecution?
Could it be the law is correct and the activists pushing this claim on the border agent’s part complete wrong?
Tony Snow helped me discover FR back in the Summer of 97 when he made reference to the Drudge Report breaking the Kathleen Wiley story in his Detroit Free Press column which was syndicated, and regularily appeared in the Washington Times.
Drudge had a link called “the Whitwater Page” which was Free Republic.
Back then, the VRWC wasn’t that vast.
Thank you Tony!
Good old Tony - still shilling for the open borders and amnesty crowd, and relegating a lot of law-abiding Republicans into the stupid, racist, and bigot camp.
That Republican voters are less than enthusiastic going into 2008 is because of the in-your-face attitude from elite Republicans like Tony and the White House and McCain and the RNC on the ILLEGAL immigration invasion.
People who have grown up respecting the law can’t understand how THEIR leaders can stiff them and their beliefs to advance the profits of law-breaking businesses and organizations.
Uh, not quite. More like the people who are tired of the government forcing the citizens to absorb millions of illegals while telling us we're the problem.
You remind me of the people who screamed that Elian Gonzalez should be shipped back to Cuba and his relatives were only in it for the money.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.