Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Myrddin

My argument would be that the IRS should not care if you are an “independent contractor” or employee since they get the tax money anyway - either from the individual “independent contractors” or the employer. I realize that they are inforcing the “law”, but in my opinion the law is wrong. Their problem is that if each of the “independent contractors” is a tax cheat, they have a lot more collection actions to take.


90 posted on 12/23/2007 6:45:24 AM PST by Western Phil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]


To: Western Phil

Yes, another such arbitrary designation into the degraded human condition of “employee” is a BIG reason off-shoring seems economic to businesses such as Boeing (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1943442/posts).

An engineer or knowledge-worker at a workstation costs a company a big money premium (maybe 33% plus) when designated as an employee. The IRS makes damn sure we US citizens can’t compete as individuals, and are way too overpriced as “employees”.


92 posted on 12/23/2007 7:05:42 AM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson