Skip to comments.
Destroying CIA Tapes Deserves a Thank You By Linda Chavez
Townhall.com ^
| 21 December 2007
| Linda Chavez
Posted on 12/22/2007 9:57:21 AM PST by K-oneTexas
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
To: K-oneTexas
Is this the, you are a bigot, Linda Chavez, the illegal employer? She can pound sand, damn liberal!
2
posted on
12/22/2007 10:01:43 AM PST
by
org.whodat
(What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
To: org.whodat
Same Linda Chavez, discredited political hack, that wants more illegals in Prince William County. Came out here to threaten “we the people.” Get a life Linda - quite living at the trough. Jorge won’t be el Preidente much longer.
3
posted on
12/22/2007 10:06:24 AM PST
by
satan
To: K-oneTexas
I think it was Thomas Sowell who first expressed this thought, which I will paraphrase:
Why is it that those people who were upset, that the identity of a CIA operative was revealed by the Bush Administration, are the same ones that are upset at the CIA's destruction of tapes for the purpose of protecting the identity of CIA operatives?
4
posted on
12/22/2007 10:07:29 AM PST
by
Michael.SF.
("democrat" -- 'one who panders to the crude and mindless whims of the masses " - Joseph J. Ellis)
To: org.whodat
Uh, last I heard, Linda was a conservative.
5
posted on
12/22/2007 10:07:49 AM PST
by
peggybac
(Tolerance is the virtue of believing in nothing)
To: K-oneTexas
Jose A. Rodriguez Jr. took the lesson of Richard Nixon and his tapes to heart.
6
posted on
12/22/2007 10:09:37 AM PST
by
em2vn
To: K-oneTexas
“Most Americans fully expected that the attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon were just the beginning of a terrorist war on American civilians.”
The beginning of a terrorist war on American civilians began long before that. At the WTC 2/26/93. In Iran in 1979.
7
posted on
12/22/2007 10:11:23 AM PST
by
enough_idiocy
(www.daypo.net/test-iraq-war.html)
Comment #8 Removed by Moderator
To: satan
Sometimes even the worst writer or opinion maker can say something that should be said. For instance: So what exactly did we expect the CIA to do when they captured high-level al-Qaida operatives? Read them their Miranda rights, provide them with free lawyers and place them in a cell with cable TV?
I've asked my liberal friends this same question and get no real answer. But if it's said enough maybe the rest, those in the silent seats, may begin to have a glimmer and speak up.
Several little tidbits stick out here, i.e.,. "seeking and receiving legal clearance".
Plus, do you think if this happened under the Clinton-Tenet Watch you would have heard a peep out of Congress. This as well as many other episodes are designed for one purpose ... so the Dems can vilify President Bush. They can't pass meaningful legislation nor do they want too.
9
posted on
12/22/2007 10:16:01 AM PST
by
K-oneTexas
(I'm not a judge and there ain't enough of me to be a jury. (Zell Miller, A National Party No More))
To: Mark was here
Destroying the tape deprives our enemy’s in the Democratic Party another bat to bash America with.
10
posted on
12/22/2007 10:18:01 AM PST
by
Mark was here
(Hard work never killed anyone, but why take the chance?)
To: org.whodat; satan
It is difficult to imagine what harm might have come from the release of the CIA interrogation tapes -- but there is no doubt that had they continued to exist, at some point they would have become public. The tapes' release would have jeopardized sources and methods used by the CIA, the most serious category of risk to American intelligence. Ignore the message and attack the messenger (for some other shortcoming)?
11
posted on
12/22/2007 10:18:05 AM PST
by
F-117A
(Mr. Bush, have someone read UN Resolution 1244 to you!!!)
To: K-oneTexas
I’m with you on this one Linda. We need more people like him.
12
posted on
12/22/2007 10:18:19 AM PST
by
BallyBill
(Serial Hit-N-Run poster)
To: org.whodat
If it’s the Linda Chavez I think it is, she’s hardly a liberal. But for a moment, let’s assume she is. Have you an argument with the points raised in her article? If you do, then bring that on as opposed to an ad hominiem, name calling, non-sequiter post. I think that would raise the level of debate considerably, IMHO.
To: K-oneTexas
I hate it when I agree with her, but she is absolutely right on this.
14
posted on
12/22/2007 10:23:31 AM PST
by
3AngelaD
(They screwed up their own countries so bad they had to leave, and now they're here screwing up ours)
To: driveserve; All
15
posted on
12/22/2007 10:23:31 AM PST
by
peggybac
(Tolerance is the virtue of believing in nothing)
To: K-oneTexas
So what exactly did we expect the CIA to do when they captured high-level al-Qaida operatives? Read them their Miranda rights, provide them with free lawyers and place them in a cell with cable TV?
To add on ... we can see under the Clinton Watch that treating terrorists as criminals and expecting the law enforcement community to be the sole line of defense and capture them had worked so very well. /sarc
16
posted on
12/22/2007 10:26:56 AM PST
by
K-oneTexas
(I'm not a judge and there ain't enough of me to be a jury. (Zell Miller, A National Party No More))
Comment #17 Removed by Moderator
To: Michael.SF.
Well, I think the answer would be that
they believe both acts were illegal.
Seems pretty simple to me.
To: K-oneTexas
Make every member of Congress personally responsible for government spending under Sarbanes-Oxley and we’ll talk later about the tapes.
19
posted on
12/22/2007 10:39:57 AM PST
by
Paladin2
(Huma for co-president!)
To: K-oneTexas
Most Americans fully expected that the attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon were just the beginning of a terrorist war on American civilians. Yes, true, but I always thought it would be the Chinese who hit us, with maybe five or six simultaneous nuclear bombs in NY, DC, Chicago, LA, Dallas, and pick your own favorite liberal center of debauchery or two.
20
posted on
12/22/2007 10:43:51 AM PST
by
Hardastarboard
(DemocraticUnderground.com is an internet hate site.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson