Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Moonman62; RoadTest; mtbopfuyn; kittymyrib; mcshot; UCFRoadWarrior; MinuteGal; freespirited; ...

1992 “Perot can’t win” —> National Debt Increases + Border Wide Open
1996 “Keyes can’t win” —> National Debt Increases + Border Wide Open
2000 “Bauer can’t win” —> National Debt Increases + Border Wide Open
2004 “[Insert Name] can’t win” —> National Debt Increases + Border Wide Open
2008 “Keyes can’t win” —> National Debt Increases + Border Wide Open

So, we just keep declaring as viable, and voting for people who spent their entire lives chasing after money (what Jesus said directly competes with affection for a holy God), instead of getting behind a straight talking patriot like Hunter.

Recipie for someone who will sell you out:

1) chases after money and helps nobody but themselves, so you become very wealthy, and conservatives get behind you, and think you are “a contender”, and conservatives also brush off those who are not rich. OR sell-out for money to special interests who will run down the country to get rich, so now with money, you “can win”.
2) since you have no morals, (after all, you chased after money to the exclusion of everything else), you never feel or speak with any passion about the evil in the world, so you never say anything the least bit offensive, so nobody can ever say, “wow, he’s really out there! I can’t get behind him!”

The only way to be “viable”, is to be evil, or sell-out.

Bush, Clinton, Bush, all sold us out, and every alternative was declared a loser from launch, because our expectations are in the gutter.

If this negativism keeps up, our next president will run up the national debt, and leave the borders open, abandon the unborn, and act as if the ACLU are harmless hacks.

All of you are better than this. You’ve simply forgotten that settling for sellouts who can “win”, actually causes you to literally lose.

Many in California voted for Arnold because unlike the real conservative Tom McClintock, “he could win”. But did the voters really win since Arnold eventually revealed himself as the liberal *we* *knew* *he* *was* during the recall election?

Hopefully, your expectations will be higher this time, than voting for a “front-runner” who can “win”, but will just sell us out.

You’re better than that. That’s why you are here on FR and not at DU. You either know that values come from our Creator, or you know that society is toast without them.

See my tagline for the short version.


51 posted on 12/22/2007 8:09:24 AM PST by ROTB (Front Runner=rich guy who doesn't hate evil and strives to offend no one, & WILL SELL YOU OUT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: ROTB
Many in California voted for Arnold because unlike the real conservative Tom McClintock, “he could win”.

(On knees) I AM FREAKING SORRY!!!! To the rest of my whole state. I was owned and fooled and I blew it. I regret my vote. Ugh. I believed Arnold because he sounded sincere when he understood the difference between freedom and the socialism he grew up with. Really. I apologize most sincerely.

98 posted on 12/22/2007 4:18:59 PM PST by Yaelle (FRED, the most intelligent choice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

To: ROTB; yorkie; Borax Queen
settling for sellouts who can “win”, actually causes you to literally lose.

bumPing that one!

103 posted on 12/22/2007 4:27:41 PM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson