[calcowgirl]

Bob doesn't understand the ramifications of what he's advocating.

I'm just trying to understand what he is advocating--or what today's version is. It's a moving target.

I acknowledge that Congress could most likely declare a law null and void but I don't believe that could be selectively applied to only two individuals in a single case. So... he seems to be advocating that letting thousands of criminals out on the street is a way to help Ramos and Compean (which is anything but a reasonable solution).

[Cyropaedia]

The same objective can be achieved through the Fifth Circuit.

Here is Olson from the Glen Beck show :

Olson said that one of his lawyers saw that the U.S. attorney did not indict Ramos and Compean using the language of the specific 924-C violation. The prosecutor had twisted the words of the statute so that they were not charged with any of the three verbs necessary for the charge. Rather, they were charged with an illegal discharge.

http://bordercontrol.blogspot.com/search?q=olson