"I think if the Mexicans are not allowed to come into the U.S. then I can see definitely the Mexicans are going to do the same to Americans," Cuellar said.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
To: flattorney; bigjoesaddle; FryingPan101; AnimalLover; backtothestreets; Olephart; pulaskibush; ...
Ping!
If you want on, or off this S. Texas/Mexico ping list, please FReepMail me.
2 posted on
12/21/2007 6:15:23 PM PST by
SwinneySwitch
(US Constitution Article 4 Section 4..shall protect each of them against Invasion...domestic Violence)
To: SwinneySwitch
Agree. Let’s cancel their “Get Into The Country FREE’ Card!
3 posted on
12/21/2007 6:16:00 PM PST by
K-oneTexas
(I'm not a judge and there ain't enough of me to be a jury. (Zell Miller, A National Party No More))
To: SwinneySwitch
"I think if the Mexicans are not allowed to come into the U.S. then I can see definitely the Mexicans are going to do the same to Americans," Cuellar said.
Aside from a handfull of owner operators I wish them lots of luck finding American drivers who go to mexico.
4 posted on
12/21/2007 6:16:35 PM PST by
cripplecreek
(Only one consistent conservative in this race and his name is Hunter.)
To: SwinneySwitch
"We don't think the Federal Motor Carriers Safety Administration has the ability right now to make sure that safety is enforced."
We can't even get an accurate count of who's illegal or not. There is no concerted attempt to prevent entry at this time. How can we possibly monitor the vehicles?
6 posted on
12/21/2007 6:18:18 PM PST by
kinoxi
To: SwinneySwitch
What else is new?
Lock down the border.
9 posted on
12/21/2007 6:24:40 PM PST by
wastedyears
("I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery." - Thomas Jefferson)
To: SwinneySwitch
LOLOLOL I just read the headline to my wife whom has worked the past 30 years for this Nations largest (Non-Union) truckload carrier, and her response still has me laughing.
“HELL...WE DON’T GO DOWN THERE ANYWAY, SO WHAT!”
She went on to say let ‘em ban us, who cares.
One would have to be crazy to risk operating in that country, not only life and limb, but risk of losing assets as well.
11 posted on
12/21/2007 6:30:39 PM PST by
rockinqsranch
(Dems, Libs, Socialists...call 'em what you will...They ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
To: SwinneySwitch; yorkie; Borax Queen; processing please hold
"I think we've done ourselves some harm," Cornyn said. "If it's a treaty obligation with the United States, it's the law." But you should know, Cornyn, that NAFTA is NOT a treaty. It was never ratified as a treaty. It is a LAW. And because it's a LAW, and NOT a TREATY, it can be changed quite easily, IF the traitors in congress and senate only had America's interests at heart, rather than your own lined pockets.
20 posted on
12/21/2007 6:39:51 PM PST by
nicmarlo
To: SwinneySwitch
Good. Since they arrest and deport all Americans who illegally enter Mexico then they won’t mind when we return the favor, right?
24 posted on
12/21/2007 6:46:57 PM PST by
PeterFinn
(A muslim in the White House would be an Obamination.)
To: SwinneySwitch
What’s ya going to do about that President Bush?
28 posted on
12/21/2007 7:07:06 PM PST by
freekitty
((May the eagles long fly our beautiful and free American sky.))
To: SwinneySwitch
"We don't think the Federal Motor Carriers Safety Administration has the ability right now to make sure that safety is enforced." Actually the DOT was prohibited from inspecting the Mexican trucks, some private firm, probably a bud of Jorge's, was suppose to inspect them.
31 posted on
12/21/2007 7:12:25 PM PST by
org.whodat
(What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
To: SwinneySwitch
I see
any disagreement with Mexico at this time as very, very good.
![](http://home.hiwaay.net/~wterrell/william.gif)
38 posted on
12/21/2007 7:37:22 PM PST by
William Terrell
(Individuals can exist without government but government can't exist without individuals.)
To: SwinneySwitch
John Cornyn has lost all credibility. It is he and Hutchison who conspired with the RATs to gut the border fence funding.
40 posted on
12/21/2007 7:40:32 PM PST by
montag813
("How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries!" -Churchill)
To: SwinneySwitch
42 posted on
12/21/2007 7:57:23 PM PST by
Kevmo
(We should withdraw from Iraq — via Tehran. And Duncan Hunter is just the man to get that job done.)
To: SwinneySwitch
“the pilot program was a move toward improving trade and, in turn, the Mexican economy.”
I see most benefit going to the last three words. Cheap labor and pretty soon “Cheap Truckin’”.
So this is about Mexican truckers bringing in goods from Mexico. I’d like to know how far this might go (if it ever does go). Who’s going to stop Mexican drivers from eventually taking loads from American truck drivers? Who’s going to blame companies for wanting to hire Mexican truck drivers, at the lower wages?
I hope this deal stays stuck.
To: SwinneySwitch
So does anyone have *any* stories of any US truckers who have started making this Mexico run or is it just smoke and mirrors so far?
47 posted on
12/21/2007 8:03:40 PM PST by
VeniVidiVici
(No buy China!!)
To: SwinneySwitch
And why again do we need to let truck drivers from 3rd world countries have free access to our interstate highway system.
We do really dumb things sometimes.
48 posted on
12/21/2007 8:06:09 PM PST by
HereInTheHeartland
("We have to drain the swamp" George Bush, September 2001)
To: SwinneySwitch
"We'd like to see NAFTA repealed," Miller said. "Just because we have a so-called agreement doesn't mean that Mexican companies can come to our country and break our law."What a xenophobic racist bigot! We welcome illegal Mexican nationals into our country to break our laws and get special treatment. Why can't we do the same for their trucking companies? < / sarcasm >
49 posted on
12/21/2007 8:08:21 PM PST by
Vigilanteman
(Are there any men left in Washington? Or are there only cowards? Ahmad Shah Massoud)
To: SwinneySwitch
"I think if the Mexicans are not allowed to come into the U.S. then I can see definitely the Mexicans are going to do the same to Americans," Cuellar said. Sounds like a good deal to me, Henry. If only you could convince the Mexis to hold up their end up the bargain...
54 posted on
12/21/2007 9:59:57 PM PST by
Mr. Mojo
To: SwinneySwitch
Retaliation is expected by the Mexican government in response to a decision this week by the U.S. Congress to stop the cross-border trucking pilot program for long-haul Mexican transport companies.A provision included in the all-inclusive omnibus spending bill passed Wednesday cuts funding for the pilot program that began in September. It was an attempt to test a stipulation that is required by the North American Free Trade Agreement that has not yet been implemented. This just cuts funding, it doesn't stop Mexican truckers from coming in. Mexican politicians must be upset over not getting pocket money.
During a phone conference Thursday, Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, said he believes that with appropriate safety measures in place to support cross-border trucking, the pilot program was a move toward improving trade and, in turn, the Mexican economy.
I don't know why our government leaders think WE must, at all cost, improve the Mexican economy. We'll never be able to create the economy necessary to keep Mexicans at home, if that's their thinking.
57 posted on
12/21/2007 10:27:10 PM PST by
Razz Barry
(Round'em up, send'em home.)
To: SwinneySwitch
This is a photo my mother sent me. TUM stands for Transportes Unidos Mexicanos-a large Mexican carrier. The "T" designates this as a 'training trailer, used for training student drivers. Interesting that a Mexican company is training spanish speaking drivers with an American company's trailer.
The TUM website.
http://www.tum.com.mx/
62 posted on
12/22/2007 6:42:01 AM PST by
cripplecreek
(Only one consistent conservative in this race and his name is Hunter.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson