[bw17]

In response to the column, Romney produced a statement of his mother’s position at the time: “I support and recognize the need for more liberal abortion rights while affirming the legal and medical measures need to protect the unborn and pregnant woman.”

This sounds just like Mitt’s stance when he was running for Senate in 1994, and the Governorship in 2002. Since then, Mitt has become firmly pro-life.

I don’t see what the problem is, other than a few ninnies at the Globe (and on FR) looking to smear Romney because their own candidates are too weak to run on their own strengths (or lack thereof).

[mbraynard]

I don’t see what the problem is, other than a few ninnies at the Globe (and on FR) looking to smear Romney because their own candidates are too weak to run on their own strengths (or lack thereof).

Direct hit.

[socialismisinsidious]

This sounds just like Mitt’s stance when he was running for Senate in 1994, and the Governorship in 2002. Since then, Mitt has become firmly pro-life.

What does that mean? So he said things to get elected? Or was he pro-choice when running and since he saw the light (or maybe a sonogram)?

I don't really care what his mother said or didn't say but she sounds like a twit. More liberal abortion? What like partial birth? and yet let's affirm medical measures to protect the unborn? Why? If abortion needs to be more liberal then the unborn is nothing so why protect it? She's seriously two-faced.

[tiger-one]

This sounds just like Mitt’s stance when he was running for Senate in 1994, and the Governorship in 2002. Since then, Mitt has become firmly pro-life.

Mitt's stance has changed on many other issues as well in 2002 through 2004 and later. This is called his conversion from Liberal to RINO.

[Stars&StripesNE]

Ping