If a preponderance of the evidence does not show that the money was ill-gotten, then he'll get it back with interest, meaning he'll actually make money on the deal.
Think that'll happen?
It's hard to say. When you string together your tidbit from the previous post, plus the fact that he was robbed (which could be a coincidence), plus the drugs, I'd say there's a good chance the money is ill-gotten. From what we know, I'd call it 75-25 against him getting it back.