Skip to comments.
Man-Made Global Warming: 10 Questions
HUMAN EVENTS ^
| 12/20/2007
| Pat Sajak
Posted on 12/20/2007 8:09:30 PM PST by neverdem
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
To: REDWOOD99
"11. Why cant we reverse global warming by turning our air conditioners on, full blast, and leaving our doors open?" Because cold air sinks, and it would all just flow down to Antarctica, where it's already cold.
21
posted on
12/20/2007 9:04:08 PM PST
by
NicknamedBob
(I had the solution for everything, but it got out of its container.)
To: neverdem
The global warming scam is all about keeping people in the dark. Its proponents can't afford to have people start asking questions. Since then they might lose their enthusiasm for the extreme lifestyle changes they are demanding.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
22
posted on
12/20/2007 9:08:47 PM PST
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: neverdem
Bravo for Mr. Sajak...his 10 questions are a good place to start. There is a multitude of questions that the global warming alarmists refuse to answer, but these are a fair and honest place to start. I won’t be holding my breath for an answer to them, however.
23
posted on
12/20/2007 9:10:12 PM PST
by
highlander_UW
(I don't know what my future holds, but I know Who holds my future)
To: CodeMasterPhilzar
Since the beginning of time there are those who have practiced the art of “Divide and Conquer”. That is what this is and it amazes me that nobody seems to recognize it for what it is.
Many are prone to giving into the “Chicken Little” fear techniques that have been used on simple minded people down through the ages and by the propagandist we know today as the Main Stream Media.
As for myself I always look into their ulterior motives as they have nothing to offer but results that will be detrimental to my welfare - so I resist their scare tactics.
What I don’t get is that so many “Smart” people accept this fear mongering and join the enemy instead of questioning those who’s goal is to separate us from reason, our money, our freedoms and anything else they want to take from us.
24
posted on
12/20/2007 9:12:43 PM PST
by
jongaltsr
(Hope to See ya in Galt's Gulch.)
To: neverdem
Are these warning signs that the movement has become more of an activist cause than a scientific reality?
This is actually just the sort of thing that we should have expected around the turn of the millennium based on the apocalyptic weirdness that took place on the threshold of the second millennium.
25
posted on
12/20/2007 9:17:16 PM PST
by
aruanan
To: alicewonders
I thought Pat Sajak was just a game show host - I had no idea he was also an intelligent thinker.
I think he's on the board of directors at Hillsdale College.
26
posted on
12/20/2007 9:17:57 PM PST
by
aruanan
To: neverdem
27
posted on
12/20/2007 9:19:04 PM PST
by
phs3
(If you call a terrorist a freedom fighter, I call you the enemy.)
To: highlander_UW
I can almost hear their shrill cry now “It’s too late you fool! There’s no time! Act now, rapid climate change is upon us! We need your unquestioning obedience, money, power, and freedoms...er...I mean support now! The debate is OVER, there’s no time nor reason for this silly objective reasoning thing...”
To: neverdem
Pat Sajak is a class act. Wish more out of Hollywood were like him.
29
posted on
12/20/2007 9:28:21 PM PST
by
jrooney
(Ron Paul makes Jimmy Carter look tough and Dennis Kucinich look sane.)
To: highlander_UW
Unfortunately there are GW activists who will condemn Sajak for daring to even ask these questions.
30
posted on
12/20/2007 9:28:44 PM PST
by
boop
(Who doesn't love poison pot pies?)
To: neverdem
If you want to hear the other side of this debate, Prof. Andrew Dessler made a fairly good case for anthropogenic warming in
this blogtalkradio debate. It isn't much of a debate. His opponent shows up late, and doesn't seem to have good responses to Dessler. The interesting thing about this broadcast is that Dessler eventually gets around to addressing most of the objections that I have heard raised by skeptics.
At this point I don't know what to think about global warming. I wish that ancient_geezer were still around here to explain how Dessler is wrong. I found him depressingly convincing.
31
posted on
12/20/2007 9:31:25 PM PST
by
TChad
To: alicewonders
He’s also a member of the Board of Regents for Hillsdale College, not to mention Republican.
32
posted on
12/20/2007 9:44:39 PM PST
by
Elsiejay
To: alicewonders
Pat Sajak had an excellent speech that he gave to Hillsdale College a couple of years back. It’s worth finding if you can.
33
posted on
12/20/2007 10:08:11 PM PST
by
gigster
To: gigster
Note to Self. Check all the other responses before you post
comments. Even I didn’t know he had published THAT much.
34
posted on
12/20/2007 10:12:32 PM PST
by
gigster
To: Sgt_Schultze
35
posted on
12/20/2007 11:00:24 PM PST
by
neverdem
(Call talk radio. We need a Constitutional Amendment for Congressional term limits. Let's Roll!)
To: grey_whiskers
Apparently he bought a clue
36
posted on
12/20/2007 11:02:40 PM PST
by
MrEdd
(Heck is the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aren't going.)
To: TChad
37
posted on
12/20/2007 11:13:54 PM PST
by
neverdem
(Call talk radio. We need a Constitutional Amendment for Congressional term limits. Let's Roll!)
To: REDWOOD99
-— 11. Why cant we reverse global warming by turning our air conditioners on, full blast, and leaving our doors open? -—
Because my mom wouldn’t let you. “The Electric Company is rich enough already!”
38
posted on
12/20/2007 11:20:30 PM PST
by
geopyg
(Don't wish for peace, pray for Victory. ------ www.gohunter08.com ------)
To: TChad
TChad,
The audio is
one and one-half hours long I listenedfor 8+ minutes.
Can you maybe, if you have the free time, give me a tiny little hint about how it turns out? . !.?
39
posted on
12/20/2007 11:27:01 PM PST
by
skeptoid
To: Elsiejay
...not to mention Republican. Which explains why he works with Vanna and not with Rosanne.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson