To: Reaganesque
The Mitt-haters think that if they carry the Hillary’s water by pre-trashing our most likely nominee, it will make up for Fred’s failure to run a competent campaign or Duncan’s total lack of viability. I keep telling them I would vote for Fred, but his organization failed to get him on the ballot in Delaware.
28 posted on
12/20/2007 6:37:45 PM PST by
Callahan
To: Callahan
44 posted on
12/20/2007 7:03:44 PM PST by
pepperhead
(Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
To: Callahan
I keep telling them I would vote for Fred, but his organization failed to get him on the ballot in Delaware.That's about as credible as any of Willard's lies.
46 posted on
12/20/2007 7:05:44 PM PST by
Petronski
(Reject the liberal superfecta: huckabee, romney, giuliani, mccain)
To: Callahan
Insightful post. Fred’s supporters are Fred’s embarrassment, and a good part of the reason his campaign cannot get any steam. Attacking good Republicans for becoming more conservative, or for minor descriptive errors, is no substitute for a positive agenda that will unite the American people.
Think 11th commandment, no matter the temptation.
94 posted on
12/21/2007 6:47:54 AM PST by
mission9
(It ain't bragging if you can do it.)
To: Callahan
If Fred is the nominee, of course I would vote for him too. That’s why I try to control what I say about him, although sometimes I feel myself being really tested by his supporters being that they seem hell bent on destroying Mitt.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson