To: reaganaut1
Romanian orphanages?
Do we really think this is sound methodology?
4 posted on
12/20/2007 2:14:35 PM PST by
JohnnyZ
(victim victim Mitt victim victim Romneyvictim victim victim so persecuted, poor me!)
To: JohnnyZ
If this goes back to the early 90’s, then orphanages in Romania (as all institutions in that country) would be severely influenced by the communist regimes that were in charge for half a century. Surely communism could also be implicated in stunting mental growth, couldn’t it?
8 posted on
12/20/2007 2:20:30 PM PST by
fhayek
To: JohnnyZ
Romanian orphanages?
Do we really think this is sound methodology?
Great point. But perhaps the only game in town because we pretty much have stopped using orphanages. Foster care is an option in this country now but not so in the 1930’s era. I write with first-hand knowledge, orphanages were great.
11 posted on
12/20/2007 2:28:48 PM PST by
ex-snook
("Above all things, truth beareth away the victory.")
To: JohnnyZ; DoughtyOne
There’s also no mention of how children were selected for foster care vs remaining in an orphanage, and how “returns” from foster care were handled. I’d suspect that the tots who seemed brighter to begin with were more likely to get into foster care and stay there.
To: JohnnyZ
My thought exactly. Romainian orphanages are definitely skewed to the extreme side of the spectrum.
19 posted on
12/20/2007 2:56:36 PM PST by
rbg81
(DRAIN THE SWAMP!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson